Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrcoolbp on Saturday April 18 2015, @01:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the executive-material? dept.

Paul Schreiber blogs about the tech behind the websites of presidential candidates. "So, you want to run a country. Can you hire someone who can run a website? ...Here's how the (declared) candidates' sites fare." There's a table comparing 4 candidates' sites based on HTTPS, URL permutations, IPv6, SSL rating, and other related qualities. Schreiber mentions that he will "update this as more candidates declare or sites change."

From the blog comments

HillaryClinton.com was using IIS (and no https) until Sunday morning, when they switched over.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 19 2015, @08:17AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 19 2015, @08:17AM (#172767)

    > The good can also be tools of evil if people are satisfied with the so-called good and forget to deal with the evil.

    Yeah, yeah, yeah. We've already been down that path in this same thread. Thanks for regurgitating:

    I'll consider it just as soon as people stop implying that the use of known-broken cryptosystems is some sort of panacea, then getting indignant when the brokenness is brought up by others.