Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Friday April 24 2015, @12:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the we-got-your-privacy-right-here dept.

CONGRESS IS HELLBENT on passing a cybersecurity bill that can stop the wave of hacker breaches hitting American corporations. And they’re not letting the protests of a few dozen privacy and civil liberties organizations get in their way.

On Wednesday the House of Representatives voted 307-116 to pass the Protecting Cyber Networks Act, a bill designed to allow more fluid sharing of cybersecurity threat data between corporations and government agencies. That new system for sharing information is designed to act as a real-time immune system against hacker attacks, allowing companies to warn one another via government intermediaries about the tools and techniques of advanced hackers. But privacy critics say it also threatens to open up a new backchannel for surveillance of American citizens, in some cases granting the same companies legal immunity to share their users’ private data with government agencies that include the NSA.

http://www.wired.com/2015/04/house-passes-cybersecurity-bill-despite-privacy-protests/

[Related]: http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/239592-white-house-supports-house-cyber-bills-with-reservations

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by anubi on Friday April 24 2015, @02:05AM

    by anubi (2828) on Friday April 24 2015, @02:05AM (#174506) Journal

    So we seem to be hell-bent about keeping the pranksters from setting fire to our wood-shack outhouses?

    Ever considered building the outhouse out of cinder block?

    I have pontificated here a lot of times... all its going to take to have a trustworthy system is to get rid of "hold harmless" clauses in exchange for copyright protection. As long as those hold harmless clauses are in effect, no one can even read web pages or informational files ( flash, .doc, whatever ) without risk of malware.

    Even further weakening interests in a secure internet is not going to help one iota...

    The administration said overly broad liability protections in both bills could "remove incentives for companies to protect their customers' personal information and may weaken cybersecurity writ large."

    Wagging Congressional pens at it isn't going to do anything. We are just acting like the angry farmer wagging his pitchfork in the air after having his outhouse set ablaze. The pranksters will return just as soon as the farmer builds a new outhouse just for the fun of it.

    Think any of our Congressmen have the balls to stand up to some big corporations and tell them they are responsible for the misery caused by their mixing executables into data? Or will we forever be hampered with vulnerabilities to malware by just opening a business document to read?

    All we are doing now is having Congressional heads erupting with hot air waving pens around like an angry farmer wagging his pitchfork. Completely impotent, but done for theater, as well as someone else's entertainment.

    I also am very leery of "hidden" processes that can't be "unhidden". A trustworthy system has to be completely inspectable and verifiable.

    I see Congress coming across as a herd of completely impotent gasbags, thinking their pens are going to solve this problem... dammit, its their pens that have created this problem!

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=3, Total=4
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5