Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 14 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Friday May 15 2015, @10:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the already-rusty dept.

After many years of waiting, version 1.0 of the Rust programming language has finally been released. The Rust home page describes Rust as "a systems programming language that runs blazingly fast, prevents nearly all segfaults, and guarantees thread safety."

Thanks to the hard work of noted Rust core team members Yehuda Katz and Steve Klabnik, Rust is now poised to become a serious competitor to established systems programming languages like C and C++.

The announcement has brought much jubilation to the followers of Rust, who have been eagerly awaiting this milestone release for so long. With only 1,940 open issues and over 11,500 issues already closed, Rust is finally ready for users to build fantastically reliable software systems using it.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 16 2015, @05:57AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 16 2015, @05:57AM (#183669)

    Regarding your comment on thread safety: the threading/sync stuff is actually a library feature (they rewrote it to be such recently). Rust's owner ship semantics are enough to make that possible. Fixing the few remaining holes in the compiler soundness checks should be easier than fixing even one large C++ project, and it will fix all the rust projects.

    As for templates: personally I like that that templates only validate once: you can't have a compile error in a particular instantiantion, and its clear what types are legal to paramaterize it with.

    If you like header files and get along well with precompiled headers, stick with your c++. I'm just happy I can call your code from rust :)

    C++ is a great language if you are a badass, but I'm much rather hire devs to write me rust than C++ where there is so much less shit they can get wrong. I could trust interns to write secure multithreaded code thats performant (Don't do that in most languages). Its also far harder to break when refactoring (The completeness guarantees on match are one such example).

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 16 2015, @01:03PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 16 2015, @01:03PM (#183741)

    Rust's owner ship semantics are enough to make that possible.

    Rust's ownership semantics will leave you scratching your head, and then once you finally understand how it's supposed to work, you'll still end up fighting the compiler.