Please also review our SoylentNews Moderation Guidelines.
As always, we are willing to make changes to the system, but please post examples *with* links to any cases of suspected mod abuse. It's a lot easier to justify changing the system when evidence is in black and white. I also recommend that users make serious proposals on changes we can make. I'm not going to color the discussion with my own opinions, but as always, I will respond inline with comments when this goes live, and post a follow up article a few days after this one
(Score: 5, Insightful) by q.kontinuum on Wednesday May 20 2015, @11:33AM
I disagree. That way, any post with just 4 proponents will get highest rating, even if it is offensive,racist,brainless shit only supported by these 5 people and no-one else
Even without these extreme cases, I think there are enough cases where a comment is halfway ok, marked hyper-clever by a minority having a lower perspective, and can't be corrected anymore.
I agree that the focus should be on promotion rather than demotion, but with our system of awarding 5 mod-points to each user every night there are really enough mod points going around to compensate for some down-mods.
Registered IRC nick on chat.soylentnews.org: qkontinuum
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 20 2015, @05:07PM
promotion rather than demotion
How about promotion costs 1 mod point and demotion costs 2 mod points?
Instead of someone subtracting five points from a side they disagree with, they can either subtract only two or add five points to "their side".
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 20 2015, @05:15PM
There is a mod for that.