Please also review our SoylentNews Moderation Guidelines.
As always, we are willing to make changes to the system, but please post examples *with* links to any cases of suspected mod abuse. It's a lot easier to justify changing the system when evidence is in black and white. I also recommend that users make serious proposals on changes we can make. I'm not going to color the discussion with my own opinions, but as always, I will respond inline with comments when this goes live, and post a follow up article a few days after this one
(Score: 5, Interesting) by takyon on Wednesday May 20 2015, @06:32PM
1. Add a +0 Agree mod.
2. Let users use +0 Agree and +0 Disagree more times a day (for example -0.1 mod points per Agree/Disagree mod).
3. Give users the ability to set a score threshold. If the threshold is -5, they don't see a post with 10 Disagree and 4 Agree mods.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 1) by anubi on Thursday May 21 2015, @07:40AM
I like that. I would even go as far as an unlimited amount of agree/disagree mods which only shows up when one looks at the moderation stats for a particular post. No karma is involved, so there would be little incentive to abuse it.
"Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]