Please also review our SoylentNews Moderation Guidelines.
As always, we are willing to make changes to the system, but please post examples *with* links to any cases of suspected mod abuse. It's a lot easier to justify changing the system when evidence is in black and white. I also recommend that users make serious proposals on changes we can make. I'm not going to color the discussion with my own opinions, but as always, I will respond inline with comments when this goes live, and post a follow up article a few days after this one
(Score: 2) by q.kontinuum on Thursday May 21 2015, @10:12AM
I think we might want to increase the supported range for comment scores. Currently, most regulars post at +2. If they are modded +1 by only three people, it is indistinguishable from a post uprated by 10 people. Especially the use of extra modifiers becomes virtually pointless.
I also saw several AC posts unjustly modded down to -1, becoming invisible to most readers. If the range went down to -2 or -3 it would imply a review-process before a post hits the bottom.
At least the top should be adjusted from time to time, depending on how many comments are committed per day, and how many mod-points are used.
That said, the current system is not broken to me; I don't have strong feelings about these proposals. But if you want to tinker anyway, this might be a parameter to adjust.
Registered IRC nick on chat.soylentnews.org: qkontinuum