Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Running an ext4 RAID0 with a Linux 4.x Kernel? Better Spray for Bugs

posted by janrinok on Tuesday May 26 2015, @04:16PM   Printer-friendly
from the patch-immediately dept.

"gewg_" writes:

The combination of RAID0 redundancy, an ext4 filesystem, a Linux 4.x kernel, and either Debian Linux or Arch Linux has been associated with data corruption.

El Reg reports EXT4 filesystem can EAT ALL YOUR DATA

Fixes are available, one explained by Lukas Czerner on the Linux Kernel Mailing List. That post suggests the bug is long-standing, possibly as far back as the 3.12-stable kernel. Others suggest the bug has only manifested in Linux 4.x.

[...] This patch for version 4.x and the patched Linux kernel 3.12.43 LTS both seem like sensible code to contemplate.

[Editor's Comment: Original Submission]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Running an ext4 RAID0 with a Linux 4.x Kernel? Better Spray for Bugs | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 45 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by janrinok on Tuesday May 26 2015, @06:53PM

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday May 26 2015, @06:53PM (#188188) Journal

    We are trying to automate the system and the quickest fix is to place the link at the bottom. The word 'writes' will not necessarily be what appears on each summary; if we edit the summary significantly then some other phrase would be more appropriate.

    However, what I would like to see is that we give this a try and then collect the views of the community after a while to decide. We have noted your suggestion - and I expect that there will be others in the coming days and weeks - and once we have something of a consensus we will revisit this to identify the optimum solution. We would rather not have the devs trying to respond to each suggestion as it occurs; that would be a very inefficient use of their time and effort.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   4  

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by http on Tuesday May 26 2015, @07:26PM

    by http (1920) on Tuesday May 26 2015, @07:26PM (#188210)

    If there's a notable edit, how about "so-and-so tells us..."?

    --
    I browse at -1 when I have mod points. It's unsettling.

    • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Wednesday May 27 2015, @11:16AM

      by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday May 27 2015, @11:16AM (#188550) Journal
      We have a variety of phrases that we can use - that isn't a particular problem for us. However, after the discussion a few days ago, explaining why the edit was necessary might take more space. Having it at the bottom makes it easier to implement a interim quick-fix solution while we decide what exactly is needed and how it can be best implemented.