Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Tuesday May 26 2015, @09:36PM   Printer-friendly
from the waze-plus dept.

Martin Brinkmann at gHacks reports

Google is rolling out a new traffic information [widget] for the mobile version of Google Maps [...] that integrates traffic information in the navigator.

The feature works in two [...] ways. In the first, traffic information [is] immediately displayed to you once you enter your destination in the app.

The application informs you about traffic jams, construction, or any other obstacles that may slow you down on your way to your destination. In addition to giving reasons, it highlights by how much you [will be] slowed down if you take a particular route.

The information [is] updated while you are following the directions Google Maps provides [...]. You may receive congestion alerts that include a delay estimate so that you know what you are getting yourself into.

Google Maps may suggest alternative routes while you are driving, and each alternative includes explanations [...] why it recommends [that you] take that route.

[...] Google makes no mention whether it is limited to certain geographical locations.

[...] The functionality seems similar to what Waze offers, a company that Google acquired in 2013.

In the comments, Naveed notes that he has already been using the feature but doesn't say for how long nor where he is.[...] and Martin, whose first language is German, uses English better than some guys I've encountered who only speak English.


[Editor's Comment: Original Submission]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Tuesday May 26 2015, @11:32PM

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Tuesday May 26 2015, @11:32PM (#188348)

    Fuck you, asshole. As the AC said, you said it was in the summary. It was NOT in the summary, so that makes you a liar, and an asshole.

    And why the fuck would I read an article when the summary clearly omits extremely important information, leading me to believe it's a stupid article that's not worth my time?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Placenta on Wednesday May 27 2015, @12:50AM

    by Placenta (5264) on Wednesday May 27 2015, @12:50AM (#188370)

    You should read both the summary and the article. They're very informative.

    • (Score: 2) by Tork on Wednesday May 27 2015, @01:03AM

      by Tork (3914) on Wednesday May 27 2015, @01:03AM (#188376)
      Lol!
      --
      Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 27 2015, @01:54AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 27 2015, @01:54AM (#188395)

      > You should read both the summary and the article. They're very informative.

      Autism for the lose.