This is a topic that comes up all too often in comments, lambasting editors or praising them.
As it stands, editorial is a black box, they accept submissions, fettle them, then they appear as stories. Recently, the Original Submission link appeared on stories so you can see what went in and what appeared out of that black box, yet still the complaints come.
Just how much transparency is necessary? (This is an open question not rhetorical)
I like to believe that SoylentNews is the people that form it as a community, and the editing should reflect that.
Should we adopt some version control for subs so everyone can see who edited what through the pipeline that goes from sub to front page?
Thoughts on a postcard please.
(Score: 2) by isostatic on Friday May 29 2015, @02:31PM
The point is, it's not. The site is a co-operative. It was born from the failures of the old site, which went downhill* as more and more money became involved.
But yeah, invisible hand is the best way to fix things, just take your wallet elsewhere. Sigh.
* Yeah yeah, it's been going downhill since it was Chips and Dips