Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday June 01 2015, @12:52AM   Printer-friendly
from the ἔρως-φιλία-ἀγάπη dept.

“Dan” seems at first to perfectly embody that popular object of scorn these days in San Francisco: the privileged tech worker. He’s a developer-turned-manager at a thriving startup, the type of guy you would expect to see dodging protesters at a Google bus stop or evicting low-income tenants in order to build his dream condo. But beyond that veneer of untouchable privilege, there is a soft underbelly. He’s a 40-year-old virgin, and his troubles with women are bad enough that he’s sought out a sex therapist for help.

This is in part a result of techies’ higher-than-average salaries, which allow them to pay for therapy, particularly when it comes to non-traditional counseling that isn’t covered by insurance. There’s something else at play here, though: In general, tech workers are more vulnerable to issues around love and intimacy, according to several local sex therapists I’ve interviewed. The reasons for this are wide-ranging, but in Dan’s particular case, it resulted from being tagged as a prodigy at a young age. He excelled in science and was encouraged to pursue it to the exclusion of all else.

The men, like Dan, who are coming to see her have been hindered by the very thing that allows them to excel in their field. “There is a very strong reinforcement [in tech] on using your brain,” says McGrath. “You brain is what’s of value.” But when it comes to sex, she says, “our brains are bullshit.”


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Tuesday June 02 2015, @05:47AM

    by bzipitidoo (4388) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday June 02 2015, @05:47AM (#191045) Journal

    "American men who aren't well-traveled just don't realize how toxic Western women have become." Yes, I forgot to mention that. Many American women have such extreme expectations that there's no pleasing them. I didn't have to travel to see that either. Some start changing their attitudes when they reach their late 30s still single and childless, and realize they would rather not stay that way. And of course, some do not. Of those, some are happy to stay single. Others become bitter. An interesting example from history were 3 of the sisters of King Louis XVI of France. They didn't want just any royalty for a husband, they wanted the crown prince or king, and of a real power, not of some piddly country like Monaco. Commoners were right out! They turned down all offers, and eventually, the offers stopped coming. They never married or had any children, and gained a reputation of being bitter old hags. Hard to say how justified that reputation was, as anyone who doesn't meet social expectations is often slandered on all sorts of issues, related or not.

    As to other parts of the world, they're making things worse for men. Every couple wants to have a boy, not a girl, and some actually murder baby girls for being the wrong gender. I hear China is especially bad that way. There have even been cases of female tourists being kidnapped and forced to marry a farmer.

    As to the suggestions of getting out there and going where the women are, places like the dance floor, that's fine, but what about the other direction? Will some of the women go where the men are? Mostly. that's a big no, they won't because they don't have to. Men come crawling to women, not the other way around. As several others have pointed out, women are bombarded with offers. That in itself is most suggestive of the imbalance. When room and resources run short, it is the females who pull back. That is, I feel, where we're at. Much more so than men, women want to feel secure before having any children,

    However, one exception is church. If you don't believe, and you're going to church just to meet women, they're going to be very unhappy when they learn you're a godless atheist or agnostic. I wonder how many men fake a lifetime of devotion to land and keep a wife. I refused to do that, so for me, church was out.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Tuesday June 02 2015, @02:16PM

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Tuesday June 02 2015, @02:16PM (#191142)

    However, one exception is church. If you don't believe, and you're going to church just to meet women, they're going to be very unhappy when they learn you're a godless atheist or agnostic. I wonder how many men fake a lifetime of devotion to land and keep a wife. I refused to do that, so for me, church was out.

    Yep, I'm the same way. My current (separated) wife used to be more religious and go to "non-denominational Christian" churches before I met her, and complained a lot about it: they would constantly preach to young women how they had to "not be unequally yoked", meaning they needed to only date men who went to church. So, as she put it, at some smaller church there'd be 10 beautiful 20-something women, and 1 creepy-looking fat weirdo with a handlebar mustache who had horrible social manners, and the women would all be chasing him.

    So, if you're willing to live a lie, and marry someone who talks about Jesus 24x7 and quotes Bible versus constantly, you can probably find an attractive woman in one of these churches.

    There is a common stereotype of women "dragging" men to church on Sundays; I even heard a country song about that not long ago. If women are, in general, a lot more religious than men in our society, this would definitely cause problems with the non-religious men like us refusing to date them (and trust me, don't do it, it's not worth it: I went through some of that with my current almost-ex-wife (now separated) and it was miserable; she was less religious and rigid by the time I hooked up with her, but it was still way too much), and lots of people on both sides ending up perpetually single. I wonder if this is one reason there seem to be far more single men than women in our society? Are we not seeing most of the single women because they're all in church and only look there (or on places like "christiansingles.com")? Everywhere I look and read, the common theme is that single women are far outnumbered by men seeking them, and this just doesn't make any sense when you consider demographics: there's almost as many girl babies born as boys, and over the age of 30 (because young men get themselves killed in large numbers doing stupid dangerous stuff) or so, women outnumber men.

    • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Tuesday June 02 2015, @03:18PM

      by bzipitidoo (4388) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday June 02 2015, @03:18PM (#191160) Journal

      Yes, have read that more boys are conceived, but it's all downhill from there. Male fetuses are more likely to miscarry, and boys are more likely to die pretty much at all stages of life. Worldwide, I think there is an oversupply of men thanks to the strong preference for male children in China and I think India, and their willingness and ability to manipulate the odds, even going as far as murdering baby girls shortly after birth.

      I wonder if women are more devout because they suffer more, thanks largely to discrimination. I've heard that people become more religious when they experience tough times. That would explain the imbalance in many churches.

      I actually am married now, to a devout woman who knew I was a "none" when it came to religion. She nearly dumped me over that, but had a change of heart. She likes to say grace over the food, and tries to drag me to church on Sunday. But there's no fakery, no living of a lie going on. I refused to pretend to convert for her sake. She had to accept that, or there would have been no marriage. She isn't trying to save me and bring me to Jesus, beyond worrying that the afterlife won't be as heavenly for her because she fears I will be burning in Hell. She's smart enough to see that non-Christians can be moral, ethical and upstanding citizens, and to see the opposite, that many self-proclaimed Christians are some of the biggest sinners and self-righteous jerks who can't stand to "love thy neighbor" and "judge not that ye be not judged" if that neighbor is gay, or a democrat, atheist, scientist, woman who's had an abortion, or just an insufficiently submissive woman, or all kinds of other things.

      • (Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Tuesday June 02 2015, @03:29PM

        by Grishnakh (2831) on Tuesday June 02 2015, @03:29PM (#191163)

        Yes, have read that more boys are conceived, but it's all downhill from there. Male fetuses are more likely to miscarry, and boys are more likely to die pretty much at all stages of life.

        It's not just conception, it's births. There's something like a 1.07:1 male-female birth ratio, IIRC. But yes, it's downhill from there: more boys get killed before adulthood, more young men die (auto accidents, wars), so after around 30 in the US the balance is in favor of women.

        Worldwide, I think there is an oversupply of men thanks to the strong preference for male children in China and I think India

        Yes, but who cares? We're talking about western society here since we're talking about SoylentNews geeks looking for women.

        I wonder if women are more devout because they suffer more, thanks largely to discrimination.

        I think it's more like women tend to be more submissive, and men tend to be more independent-thinking.