Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Saturday March 22 2014, @02:37AM   Printer-friendly
from the questions-without-answers dept.

AnonTechie writes:

"Echoing a question asked on programmers.stackexchange.com - How can software be protected from piracy ?

It just seems a little hard to believe that with all of our technological advances and the billions of dollars spent on engineering the most unbelievable and mind-blowing software, we still have no other means of protecting against piracy than a "serial number/activation key." I'm sure a ton of money, maybe even billions, went into creating Windows 7 or Office and even Snow Leopard, yet I can get it for free in less than 20 minutes. Same for all of Adobe's products, which are probably the easiest. Can there exist a fool-proof and hack-proof method of protecting your software against piracy? If not realistically, could it be theoretically possible? Or no matter what mechanisms these companies deploy, can hackers always find a way around it ?"

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Foobar Bazbot on Sunday March 23 2014, @07:42AM

    by Foobar Bazbot (37) on Sunday March 23 2014, @07:42AM (#19896) Journal

    That said, suggesting that registered users should hide by posting anonymously just because their comments might incite debate or disagreement is hardly something that we should be promoting.

    Well, I agree. But you're the one advocating that registered users should hide for fear of mod abuse; I'm just saying anyone who does feel the need to hide should hide behind an opaque object, while you're saying we should hand them a sheet of plexiglass and assure them that it's good concealment, and can't be seen through without "additional skill and effort".

    Ignoring the effort required to implement the feature, I don't see what the down-side of having the *choice* to prevent unfriended users from being able to view your list of recent comments would be?

    "Ignoring the effort required" is silly, because absent any real benefit, the effort required is enough reason not to implement it.

    But I'll play along: ignoring the cost of implementation, the downside is providing users a false sense of security, leading them to post pieces of information across many posts that, in total, represents a profile they'd rather not share, in the belief that any aggregation of these pieces will be limited by human memory.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2