posted by
takyon
on Saturday June 20 2015, @11:30PM
An Anonymous Coward writes:
"At some point as a country, we have to reckon with what happens. It's not enough to express sympathy. You don't see this kind of murder, on this scale, with this kind of frequency in other advanced countries on earth." - President Obama.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @09:27PM
by Anonymous Coward
on Sunday June 21 2015, @09:27PM (#199209)
I think a better argument would be that a government must own the individuals' bodies, taking their self-sovereignty, before they can institute a death penalty. A government which literally owns people would also be a government that condones slavery. Self-sovereignty is one of the few fundamental rights that should have no limits and few if any exceptions - one should not lose ownership of their own body, not because they got pregnant, not because they committed a crime, never. This means suicide is a fundamental right as well; the only possible exception would be if one is literally incapable of tending to themselves, eg, comatose / vegetative state or extreme delirium.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @09:27PM
I think a better argument would be that a government must own the individuals' bodies, taking their self-sovereignty, before they can institute a death penalty. A government which literally owns people would also be a government that condones slavery. Self-sovereignty is one of the few fundamental rights that should have no limits and few if any exceptions - one should not lose ownership of their own body, not because they got pregnant, not because they committed a crime, never. This means suicide is a fundamental right as well; the only possible exception would be if one is literally incapable of tending to themselves, eg, comatose / vegetative state or extreme delirium.