Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Monday March 24 2014, @03:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the nothing-funny-to-say dept.

janrinok writes:

"A paper published jointly by University of Warwick and Ruhr-University Bochum states that 'Researchers have found that preterm children are at an increased risk of having general cognitive and mathematic problems.'"

From the paper:

Dyscalculia, a learning disorder which involves frequent problems with everyday arithmetic tasks, is diagnosed when children do worse in maths than would be expected based on their general intelligence. Study co-author Professor Dieter Wolke from the University of Warwick explained, 'Mathematic impairment is not the same as dyscalculia. A child with both low IQ and low mathematic abilities can have general mathematic impairment without suffering from dyscalculia'.

The study's results, which looked at 922 children between the ages of seven and nine, showed that there is no direct correlation between preterm births and dyscalculia. However, the authors showed that being small-for-gestational-age is an indicator of whether a child is likely to have dyscalculia.

Children who are born very preterm, before 32 weeks, of gestational age have a 39.4% chance of having general mathematic impairment compared to 14.9% of those born at term (39 to 41 weeks), which translates into a significantly increased odds ratio of 3.22 (after controlling for child sex, socioeconomic background and small-for-gestational-age birth). In contrast, very preterm children's risk of being diagnosed with dyscalculia was with an odds ratio of 1.62 (22.6%) compared with term controls (13.7%) not significantly increased. 'What this study has shown is that preterm children are not at an increased risk of having dyscalculia, but their risk may be increased if they were born small for gestational age', says Professor Wolke.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by morgauxo on Monday March 24 2014, @01:18PM

    by morgauxo (2082) on Monday March 24 2014, @01:18PM (#20196)

    A good case for euthanasia? Really? So you think that people who aren't good at math should die then?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 28 2014, @03:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 28 2014, @03:05PM (#22540)

    I'm assuming "term" is "termination". It seems to me that all children (and adults) are at risk of having "maths" problems (here in the states we just cal it "math") at some point before death, and if the Terminator taught me anything, it's that termination = death.

    So why are we calling them preterm again? Or are we not talking about termination of the child? If so, calling them "preterm children" when "term" doesn't actually refer to termination of the child seems ... wrong.

    In conclusion, the english language is weird.