Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 9 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Thursday July 16 2015, @06:11PM   Printer-friendly
from the leveling-the-playing-field dept.

The Platform reports that CPU export restrictions to Chinese supercomputing centers may have backfired. Tianhe-2 has remained the world's top supercomputer for the last five iterations of the TOP500 list using a heterogeneous architecture that mixes Intel's Xeon and Xeon Phi chips. Tianhe-2 will likely be upgraded to Tianhe-2A within the next year (rather than by the end of 2015 as originally planned), nearly doubling its peak performance from 54.9 petaflops to around 100 petaflops, while barely raising peak power usage. However, instead of using a new Intel Xeon Phi chip, a homegrown "China Accelerator" and novel architecture will be used.

A few details about the accelerator are known:

Unlike other [digital signal processor (DSP)] efforts that were aimed at snapping into supercomputing systems, this one is not a 32-bit part, but is capable of supporting 64-bit and further, it can also support both single (as others do) and double-precision. As seen below, the performance for both single and double precision is worth remarking upon (around 2.4 single, 4.8 double teraflops for one card) in a rather tiny power envelope. It will support high bandwidth memory as well as PCIe 3.0. In other words, it gives GPUs and Xeon Phi a run for the money—but the big question has far less to do with hardware capability and more to do with how the team at NUDT will be able to build out the required software stack to support applications that can gobble millions of cores on what is already by far the most core-dense machine on the planet.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Sunday July 19 2015, @01:39AM

    by Gaaark (41) on Sunday July 19 2015, @01:39AM (#210927) Journal

    Except for the times where Linux support is better...

    ...using Windows xp one time on my wife's computer ( quite a few years ago) I bought a printer that was both xp and Linux compatible.

    Install the drivers for the printer:wasted an hour rebooting every time it installed each driver (printer, scanner, fax, etc) and also having to update internet explorer for the printer!

    Plugged the printer into my Linux box and 20 seconds later, it was Installed and fully ready to use.

    I'm using(trying) Arch(antergos) currently and with their rolling release, the driver problem shouldn't really exist (or so I think).

    Anywho, I guess I'd really rather go through the hairyfeet challenge with Linux then the kill me now challenge with Windows (the modem driver doesn't come pre-exisisting in Windows... would you like to download it from the internet!!!!!!) Sure MS, show me how to download the driver for the internet when I have no driver for the internet connection!?!?!!!

    Guess we just disagree. :)

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. I have always been here. ---Gaaark 2.0 --
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2