Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Sunday August 09 2015, @03:17PM   Printer-friendly
from the sauce-for-the-goose dept.

Police who raided a marijuana store, destroying security cameras and the DVR, harassing the store's customers, consuming edible marijuana products, and playing darts, were caught on camera. The cops claim that said recording is illegal because the cops had an expectation of privacy after destroying all of the security cameras.

I wish I could make up this stuff.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Freeman on Monday August 10 2015, @05:03PM

    by Freeman (732) Subscriber Badge on Monday August 10 2015, @05:03PM (#220759) Journal

    Assuming your 99% giving the rest a bad name was actually correct, we would have a lot more troubles than we do. In actuality, despite what the internet hordes may want you to believe, there are less than 1% bad cops giving the greater than 99% good cops a bad name. That may vary depending on location, though. Most police officers are trying to do right by their families and doing something messed up like this doesn't help.

    --
    Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2015, @05:39PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 10 2015, @05:39PM (#220774)

    For the "less than 1% bad cops" to get away with it, most cops have to be complicit by not reporting the 1%, and I would not call those cops that cover up for the bad cops "good cops", therefore even if you only define a small percentage as bad, most cops certainly are not good cops.