SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the companies==people-er-does-not-compute dept.
gishzida writes:
"According to a Reuters report Supreme Court signals support for corporate religious claims, "The U.S. Supreme Court appeared poised on Tuesday to open the door to companies' religious-based objections to government regulations as justices weighed whether business owners can object to part of President Barack Obama's healthcare law. From the article:
During a 90-minute oral argument, 30 minutes more than usual, a majority of the nine justices appeared ready to rule that certain for-profit entities have the same religious rights to object as individuals do. A ruling along those lines would likely only apply to closely held companies. As in most close cases of late, Justice Anthony Kennedy will likely be the deciding vote. Based on his questions, it was unclear whether the court would ultimately rule that the companies had a right to an exemption from the contraception provision of President Barack Obama's 2010 Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare.
The dozens of companies involved in the litigation do not all oppose every type of birth control. Some object only to emergency contraceptive methods, such as the so-called morning-after pill, which they view as akin to abortion.
The case marks the second time Obamacare has featured prominently before the Supreme Court. In 2012, the court upheld by a 5-4 vote the constitutionality of the act's core feature requiring people to get health insurance. Although the case has no bearing on the overall healthcare law, it features its own volatile mix of religious rights and reproductive rights. A capacity crowd filled the marble courtroom, while outside hundreds of demonstrators, most of them women, protested loudly in an early spring snowstorm.
We already know that the SCOTUS thinks corporations are citizens, do you think the SCOTUS should allow corporations to have religious beliefs too?"
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Bob The Cowboy on Wednesday March 26 2014, @11:12PM
What does this have to do with anything?
I'd say its pretty obvious what the poster's position is. Yes, Catholic or not, employers don't get to dictate what employees do with their compensation. What if the employees were not Catholic? Why do the employer's rights trump?
What if instead of a Catholic employer, it was a Christian Scientist who objected to paying for healthcare at all on religious grounds? Or a Jehovah's Witness employer refusing to cover blood transfusions?
(Score: 3, Funny) by dast on Wednesday March 26 2014, @11:23PM
The corporation's rights trump because only they are really persons. Individuals must be more like cells in the body of a corporation. And if you don't work for one, you are no better than bacteria or viruses.
(Score: 1) by fliptop on Thursday March 27 2014, @02:53AM
I'm sure there's no law saying you must work at any of those places.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
(Score: 1) by mashdar on Thursday March 27 2014, @03:59AM
If Christian Science corporations don't have to pay for health insurance, I give the majority of shit-bag tax dodger types a year before they are Christian Science based.
The whole point of the ACA is to keep shitty people from leeching of reasonable people and shitty corporations from pushing expenses onto the public. (And not let insurance companies be shitty and drop you when you actually get sick, and not allow you to get superfucked for life by leaving a job, aging out of an insurance pool, etc. I could go on...)
You don't get to dictate your employee's religion, and you don't get to dictate what they do with their benefits. Health benefits are (in US tax law) a form of pay.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 27 2014, @10:56AM
Likewise, there is no law saying that a Christian or Catholic entity must form a business large enough to be required to provide healthcare. As the justices also pointed out, a Christian business entity of any size is also allowed not to provide healthcare, so long as they pay the fine/tax.
Long and short is: if your (or your business entity's) religious beliefs conflict with a specific course of business, then maybe you should choose a different business. I don't, for example, see many Kosher or Halal barbeque restaurants.