Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday August 17 2015, @07:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the looking-for-references-in-all-the-wrong-places dept.

An Anonymous Coward write:

A friend from academia recently invited me to write a paper for a journal that he is guest editing. I don't write many papers (not in academia), so I figured I better look through the Author Guidelines to see what formats they would accept, etc.

Here is the Inderscience author faq page.

This one stopped me in my tracks:

Why am I asked to identify four experts?

You must identify four experts in the subject of your article, details of which will be requested during online submission. The experts must not be members of the editorial board of any Inderscience journal, must not be from your* institution, and at least two of them must be from a different country from you*.

The purpose of this request is ensure your familiarity with the latest research literature in the field and to identify suitable experts who can be added to our Experts Database and who may be asked if they are willing to review articles for Inderscience journals; we are unlikely to ask them to referee your article.
(*"you" refers to all authors of the paper)

Has anyone else been asked to identify professional friends by a journal publisher?

Needless to say, I'm not writing anything for Inderscience until this request is removed. Or maybe I'll write the paper as a favor to my friend...and provide names of experts from my field who are deceased.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by SubiculumHammer on Monday August 17 2015, @08:11PM

    by SubiculumHammer (5191) on Monday August 17 2015, @08:11PM (#224078)

    There is typically a suggest reviewer section. They are only lightly relied upon, but are useful to editors.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 17 2015, @08:27PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday August 17 2015, @08:27PM (#224086)

    The modified version of this (I submitted a journal manuscript on Friday) is the "from this list of reviewers, who are the most expert in your field. From this list, who are your top 2, and top 4 reviewers?". Presumably, unless my top selections are overloaded, they will be my "blind" reviewers.