einar writes:
Irish Times has an article quoting Guardian deputy editor, Paul Johnson, that the Guardian was threatened to be closed by the British government. According to Johnson, the Snowden leak was the most difficult story the Guardian has ever done.
As a reminder, the newspaper was walking a tightrope keeping the balance between giving in where necessary and defending the freedom of press in a country where this right is rather weak. During the Snowden leaks, even PCs were destroyed in the presence of GCHQ agents. All in the name of national security.
From the article:
Mr Johnson said the whole attitude in the UK was that national security trumped press freedom and that the newspaper should not publish a word. This was in contrast to the US, where the Snowden revelations had led to a debate about how far intelligence agencies should go to protect the state.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by MrGuy on Thursday March 27 2014, @07:47PM
No, no, no, don't misunderstand us, friends! We didn't threaten to close a major outlet of the independent press. We simply threatened to CENSOR a major outlet of the independent press because we didn't like what they were going to say! Totally different! We'd only close threaten to close them down if they didn't voluntarily allow us to censor them.