There is a lot of talk on the net these days about microagressions, and it's good netiquette to post trigger warnings before discussing sensitive topics. What's good in online forums isn't necessarily appropriate in-person, especially on University campuses. The cover article for September's edition of The Atlantic magazine discusses the harm that students' requests for trigger warnings on course content and accusations of microagression are causing, stifling open conversation on campuses across America. The authors also suggest that these student behaviors are actively causing harm to the students.
Avoiding trigger topics, instead of assisting those who have suffered traumas, perpetuates and enhances the pathology of the phobias they hope not to trigger. The hunt for microagression creates in the students cognitive distortions that are usually treated with cognitive behavioral therapy. The authors are calling this "The Coddling of the American Mind", and suggest it will create a generation of graduates unable to cope with the world after graduation.
The authors also appeared on the Diane Rehm show, on a segment called "The New Political Correctness: Why Some Fear It's Ruining American Education". Far from trying to shut down the conversation about race relations, the authors are trying to re-open it.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday September 01 2015, @05:57PM
You are in just the right frame of mind to fit in with all of those who need trigger warnings.
It's all about manipulating the system to suit yourself. Those little microrages are intended to gain attention, if nothing else. As TFA points out, students use that crap to get out of classes and assignments, as well as other forms of special treatment. It's like, "Oh, I've suffered, you owe me a few free college credits that I don't really intend to earn!"
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.