Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday September 17 2015, @01:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the get-the-twinkies dept.

Researches have created a strain of yeast with THC, as well as other parts of marijuana.

In August, researchers announced they had genetically engineered yeast to produce the powerful painkiller hydrocodone. Now comes the perhaps inevitable sequel: Scientists have created yeasts that can make important constituents of marijuana, including the main psychoactive compound, tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC.

Synthetic versions of THC are available in pill form under brand names like Marinol and Cesamet; they are generally used to treat nausea, vomiting and loss of appetite caused by H.I.V. infection or cancer chemotherapy. Genetically modified yeast could make THC in a cheaper and more streamlined way than traditional chemical synthesis.

Using yeast could also shed light on the clinical usefulness of cannabis-derived compounds. Marijuana is increasingly embraced as medicine, yet there is limited evidence that it is effective against many of the conditions for which it is prescribed. Researchers hoping to separate fact from wishful thinking will need much better access to marijuana's unique constituents. Modified yeast may provide them.

Why can't they just legalize cannabis, and none of this would be necessary?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 17 2015, @02:43PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 17 2015, @02:43PM (#237474)

    In school I never met a dope head with any motivation to do anything except smoke more pot.

    Do we really need a generation of even lazier fuckups?

    Alcohol is legal, and everybody is responsible with that right?

  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Snow on Thursday September 17 2015, @03:13PM

    by Snow (1601) on Thursday September 17 2015, @03:13PM (#237484) Journal

    I smoke about an ounce a month. I smoke every day.

    I finished high school. I finished post secondary. I got a job. I make almost 90k/year. I'm married. I own my house, and we have 2 cars. This weekend me and my wife will be doing a 40km backpacking trip in the mountains (I'm not a fat slob -- well not fat anyways...).

    Most people would have no idea I smoke so much weed. It is definitely possible to be a functional pot head, and I suspect more people are doing it that you imagine.

    • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 17 2015, @03:36PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 17 2015, @03:36PM (#237503)

      Judging by the number of kids I saw who did back then, and where they are now, I'd say the majority of them are still fuckups.

      While your fairy tale life is the norm for you, for the rest it is not.
      If your "story" is true, it is likely that you possess the willpower to not let it control your life. Most do not, and even pot ruins lives.

      Personally I think you're lying through your teeth, but hey this is the internet, so tell the biggest tall tale you can.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by tchuladdiass on Thursday September 17 2015, @03:40PM

      by tchuladdiass (1692) on Thursday September 17 2015, @03:40PM (#237504)

      My personal opinion is that it isn't the pot that makes people lazy screwups, it is the lazy screwups that are more attracted to smoking pot in the first place (exceptions such as yours notwithstanding).

      • (Score: 2) by Snow on Thursday September 17 2015, @04:32PM

        by Snow (1601) on Thursday September 17 2015, @04:32PM (#237543) Journal

        Yea, I would agree with that. Also, I never said that I wasn't lazy... Just that I'm not a screwup.

      • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Friday September 18 2015, @12:59AM

        by Immerman (3985) on Friday September 18 2015, @12:59AM (#237738)

        Or perhaps it's only the lazy screwups that don't bother to hide the fact that they're regularly consuming one of the most illegal drugs in the country?

  • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Thursday September 17 2015, @04:55PM

    by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Thursday September 17 2015, @04:55PM (#237553) Homepage Journal

    What ignorance. I worked since I was 16, spent 4 years in the Air Force, went to college, and am now comfortably retired, now I'm writing science fiction all day. I started smoking pot in 1971 and still do. I know a LOT of stoners, and all of them are either employed full-time or retired.

    So shove your bigotry up your ass, coward.

    --
    No one born who could always afford anything he wanted can have a clue what "affordability" means.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by sjames on Thursday September 17 2015, @05:20PM

    by sjames (2882) on Thursday September 17 2015, @05:20PM (#237570) Journal

    It's selection bias. You know about the dysfunctional fuck-ups drug habits, but you never see the habits of someone functional enough to hide it.

  • (Score: 1) by malloc_free on Thursday September 17 2015, @05:22PM

    by malloc_free (3034) on Thursday September 17 2015, @05:22PM (#237572) Journal
    We all have the power to make certain choices in our lives. We can choose to eat foods that are high in saturated fat and refined carbohydrates, and become overweight. We can smoke tobacco and drink alcohol, and increase the likely hood of getting lung cancer and cirrhosis. So why can we not also make the choice to get stoned? Not sure if any of the other things actually lead to a better life or not. What about gambling, that is of no real particular use for anyone except those who make money from it. What I do in my spare time is my choice, and if I am not impinging on anyone else's human rights (directly or otherwise), who has the right to say what I can and cannot do? And lets face it - prohibition is not working - economically or socially. Taxation and regulation will work out far better IMHO. However this would appear to be rational, sensible thinking, and I don't think that the generations of people that were brought up with the idea that drugs are somehow immoral (I mean, really?) will ever get over that. Too much indoctrination. Also, the crime surrounding drugs would practically disappear overnight if prohibition was lifted (admittedly I am just applying some common sense here, can freely admit I may be wrong). Plus regulation would mean that what drugs were being consumed would be of a certain standard and quality, and there would be no mystery to what a pill would contain. Then again I have a bias. My birthday 4/20. :-D
  • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Thursday September 17 2015, @06:48PM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Thursday September 17 2015, @06:48PM (#237622)

    The fundamental right to control your own body is far more important than your personal feelings about people who smoke marijuana. But it's clear that petty things like fundamental liberties don't even factor into anything you believe.