Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday September 17 2015, @01:09PM   Printer-friendly
from the get-the-twinkies dept.

Researches have created a strain of yeast with THC, as well as other parts of marijuana.

In August, researchers announced they had genetically engineered yeast to produce the powerful painkiller hydrocodone. Now comes the perhaps inevitable sequel: Scientists have created yeasts that can make important constituents of marijuana, including the main psychoactive compound, tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC.

Synthetic versions of THC are available in pill form under brand names like Marinol and Cesamet; they are generally used to treat nausea, vomiting and loss of appetite caused by H.I.V. infection or cancer chemotherapy. Genetically modified yeast could make THC in a cheaper and more streamlined way than traditional chemical synthesis.

Using yeast could also shed light on the clinical usefulness of cannabis-derived compounds. Marijuana is increasingly embraced as medicine, yet there is limited evidence that it is effective against many of the conditions for which it is prescribed. Researchers hoping to separate fact from wishful thinking will need much better access to marijuana's unique constituents. Modified yeast may provide them.

Why can't they just legalize cannabis, and none of this would be necessary?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Thursday September 17 2015, @07:33PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Thursday September 17 2015, @07:33PM (#237642) Homepage Journal

    I think you just wanna argue at this point. I think it should be legal and I also think that cops need a way to make sure you get your driver's license taken away if you drive stoned. There is nothing mutually exclusive in those two ideas.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Friday September 18 2015, @12:20AM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Friday September 18 2015, @12:20AM (#237722)

    "Come up with a quick and easy way to scientifically prove that someone is stoned while driving and I'm fine with it."

    That sounds to me like "First come up with a way to scientifically prove that someone is stoned, and then I'll be in favor of legalizing it." If that's not what you think, then fine, but that's how it sounded.