Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday September 23 2015, @04:06AM   Printer-friendly
from the go-where-the-money-is dept.

As technology upends industries and lifestyles at breakneck pace, the Old Continent is not producing any of the online giants like Google, eBay or Facebook. Its best and brightest prefer to emigrate to Silicon Valley, or sell their ideas on to U.S. firms before they have a chance to establish themselves.

The European Union's top executives in Brussels are trying to rectify that with a long-term plan of reforms and incentives but face an uphill battle. The 28-nation bloc is, above all, lacking in the risk-taking culture and financial networks needed to grow Internet startups into globally dominant companies.

Europe's relatively cautious attitude to investment stands out as one of the biggest hurdles—and among the most difficult to change. Investors in Europe want to see that a young company can generate revenue from the start. Europe's many high-technology companies are focused on manufactured goods that can be sold right away to generate revenue—industrial equipment, energy turbines, high-speed trains, medical devices, and nuclear energy.

By contrast, Internet companies often have little to no revenue at the beginning. Twitter and Facebook, for example, first focused on building up their user numbers. Only once they were established as global forces did they put more attention to making money, through advertising and other strategies.
This difference in mentality stands out as one of the key reasons that Europe has fewer venture capital firms and less investment in startups than the U.S. or Asia.

Over the past five years, U.S. venture capitalists spent $167 billion on new business ideas compared with some $20 billion by their European counterparts, according to the National Venture Capital Association.

http://phys.org/news/2015-09-europe-isnt-googles-facebooks.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Wednesday September 23 2015, @09:12PM

    by maxwell demon (1608) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday September 23 2015, @09:12PM (#240716) Journal

    They make more profit by selling a new $80 000 unit in five years.

    Welcome to the corporate world. Things are not designed to be best. They are designed to be most profitable.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by K_benzoate on Thursday September 24 2015, @01:26AM

    by K_benzoate (5036) on Thursday September 24 2015, @01:26AM (#240788)

    They make more profit by selling a new $80 000 unit in five years.

    No, they don't. Medical practices buy new machines when the old ones literally stops working--no matter what. What actually happens is they just keep using the insecure imager with the unpatched, abandoned, operating system. So Zeiss doesn't make more money. The practice doesn't get a secure machine. Patients don't get secure medical records. NO ONE WINS. Thanks capitalism!

    --
    Climate change is real and primarily caused by human activity.