scientists at UCLA have used a powerful microscope to image the three-dimensional positions of individual atoms to a precision of 19 trillionths of a meter, which is several times smaller than a hydrogen atom.
Their observations make it possible, for the first time, to infer the macroscopic properties of materials based on their structural arrangements of atoms, which will guide how scientists and engineers build aircraft components, for example. The research, led by Jianwei (John) Miao, a UCLA professor of physics and astronomy and a member of UCLA's California NanoSystems Institute, is published Sept. 21 in the online edition of the journal Nature Materials.
One step closer to The Diamond Age.
(Score: 2) by bart9h on Wednesday September 23 2015, @05:47PM
The site won't display even any text without Javascript. Had to add it to NoScript whitelist just to be able to read the article.
(Score: 5, Interesting) by TheGratefulNet on Wednesday September 23 2015, @05:53PM
I do a staged unblock if a site comes up blank (on the content). after a few tries - if there is still nothing - I leave and don't come back.
this crap ruined the web. you mean you have to RUN CODE in my browser for me to see TEXT? fuck you, webmaster. just go fuck yourself.
pisses me off.
the way I handle this is that most of the news stories I would want to read also appear in aggregators (such as fark). if I can't see the article, I can see the fark comments and they often are even more 'telling' about the subject matter, also often including graphics that the article tried to 'protect'. I'm more after the commentary, anyway, as it helps complete the story and balances the 'corp speak' that is all we hear from jscript-locked content.
"It is now safe to switch off your computer."
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 23 2015, @06:52PM
You mean like SN? No-one RTFA anyway...
(Score: 2) by Hyperturtle on Wednesday September 23 2015, @09:37PM
oh that's what I said but I was trying to be nice and refer to somewhere else.
(Score: 2) by Hyperturtle on Wednesday September 23 2015, @08:10PM
wait -- you're saying they are following in the long line of responding to articles without having first read them, and that you believe they are more telling than the subject matter and article itself?
Where do you think you are... Slashdot?
Maybe we need to embrace the methods of the past in order to deal with the future! No one read the article then because bandwidth was too low, but no one can actually read them now due to technological advancement.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 24 2015, @08:39AM
FTFY
(Score: 2) by Yog-Yogguth on Saturday September 26 2015, @01:45PM
Complete agreement (I do the same as you with NoScript), and since I didn't even have to try that I found other sources (below) and the actual paper [ucla.edu] as published (it's only 8 pages total including all the references and nitty gritty, so more like 4 but plenty enough to make my brain hurt) among the publications at the page of the UCLA Coherent Imaging Group [ucla.edu] who wrote it.
There's also a phys.org writeup [phys.org] and an ecnmag writeup [ecnmag.com]. These two are very similar to each other but not identical.
None of the above links require scripts so please enjoy :)
Bite harder Ouroboros, bite! tails.boum.org/ linux USB CD secure desktop IRC *crypt tor (not endorsements (XKeyScore))
(Score: 2) by Yog-Yogguth on Saturday September 26 2015, @01:53PM
Gah I forgot to point out that the actual paper is a PDF but I guess most would assume that, still I prefer adding a warning/note to PDF links but it slipped —sorry :|
Bite harder Ouroboros, bite! tails.boum.org/ linux USB CD secure desktop IRC *crypt tor (not endorsements (XKeyScore))