Volkswagen has issued a statement regarding the emissions cheating incident:
Discrepancies relate to vehicles with Type EA 189 engines, involving some eleven million vehicles worldwide. A noticeable deviation between bench test results and actual road use was established solely for this type of engine. Volkswagen is working intensely to eliminate these deviations through technical measures. The company is therefore in contact with the relevant authorities and the German Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA – Kraftfahrtbundesamt).
To cover the necessary service measures and other efforts to win back the trust of our customers, Volkswagen plans to set aside a provision of some 6.5 billion EUR recognized in the profit and loss statement in the third quarter of the current fiscal year. Due to the ongoing investigations the amounts estimated may be subject to revaluation. Earnings targets for the Group for 2015 will be adjusted accordingly.
Volkswagen does not tolerate any kind of violation of laws whatsoever. It is and remains the top priority of the Board of Management to win back lost trust and to avert damage to our customers. The Group will inform the public on the further progress of the investigations constantly and transparently.
From The Register:
To put that in perspective, Volkswagen's profits for the last financial year were €10.85bn (US$12.1bn), so the firm is banking on having to pay out at least half of its profits, and possibly a lot more. The EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) has already said that the company could be liable for up to $18bn in fine and fix costs, and that was when only half a million cars were thought to be dodgy. As a result, the wheels have fallen off the company's stock price. Shares have nearly halved in value since the firm admitted using the emission-control software, and they are likely to fall further as the scandal unfolds.
Volkswagen's CEO Martin Winterkorn has already issued a public apology for his firm's conduct, and his position is looking increasingly untenable. Rumors of his forced retirement are already circulating, although these are being denied at present.
The case could also have an interesting knock-on effect in the software field. Technically, Volkswagen's software was covered under the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act, meaning tinkerers couldn't have examined and altered the code. The EPA has been lobbying with car companies to make sure the DMCA continues to make engine management software off limits to tinkerers. But based on its experience with Volkswagen, the agency may be changing that stance.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation has been quick to pounce on the DMCA connection.
The BBC reports that this affects 11 million vehicles worldwide, although many of those have passed local emission controls satisfactorily. Neverthless, the same or similar software is believed to be fitted in all those vehicles. The EPA found the "defeat device", the device that allowed VW cars to emit less during tests than they would while driving normally, in diesel cars including the Audi A3 and the VW Jetta, Beetle, Golf and Passat models.
Update: Volkswagen chief executive Martin Winterkorn resigns.
(Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Wednesday September 23 2015, @07:11PM
Well, not since they got caught, at least.
But, hey, a CEO is falling on his sword. So that should make someone happy?
"Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 23 2015, @07:29PM
So what is the General Motors CEO doing? We need somebody under the bus from them also. The dead people are waiting.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 23 2015, @08:41PM
GM/Ford/Toyota were guilty of gross negligence/indifference. VW is guilty of active malice.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 24 2015, @07:08AM
And the number of people killed by VW's naughty is?
(Score: 2) by isostatic on Thursday September 24 2015, @08:10AM
VW made $100b. Paid a $60b fine, so are still $40b up.
CEO gets a nice big payoff and has a holiday for a while, then comes back in a year or two when it's died down.
(Score: 1) by nitehawk214 on Sunday September 27 2015, @02:00AM
I would like to think the company would have been more profitable if they had not cheated.
Though it certainly netted the CEO a lot of money. There is very little incentive for CEOs to act in the best interest of companies. Once you have been a CEO of a major company, no matter how you get fired, no matter if you drive the company into the ground; you are pretty much golden to walk in to another company and start all over.
"Don't you ever miss the days when you used to be nostalgic?" -Loiosh