SoylentNews is people
Sections
SoylentNews
from the delayed-dissemination-deemed-despicable dept.
Over the past year as the communications service Twitter has rolled out new features with the stated goal of stopping "abusive tweets", critics have expressed concerns that this technology may be used for political censorship. These concerns received broader attention last week when Cryptome published a report by Paul Dietrich alleging that Twitter had hidden information about leaked NSA papers from American users.
As alleged by Dietrich, Twitter will hide information from users for the critical period of the first 24 hours, when users are most likely to spread the information, before allowing the information to be seen again. The disappearance and reappearance of the information resembles a software glitch. Dietrich describes this mechanism as "Censorship that doesn't look like censorship... Subtle, deniable, and quite ruthless."
Concerns about the system were first raised in April by Twitter user Daddy Warpig who reported that Twitter was hiding all posts by certain users of the conservative #TCOT and liberal #Gamergate hashtags along with users affiliated with the Sad Puppies campaign of science-fiction authors protesting against a perceived bias in the Hugo Awards.
Twitter introduced a revised system in May, stating that it would hide only "tweets sent directly to an individual which are from a recently registered account and use language similar to previously flagged messages." Lizzy Finnegan, a writer for the Escapist, discovered that Twitter was hiding messages from established users who had previously used the #Gamergate hashtag but was not blocking new accounts created to test the system by sending the exact same messages.
[More after the break.]
This is not the only time that Twitter has been accused of censorship. A report headlined by Rima Tamash of Rice University found that Twitter had censored 266,407 tweets of 7,642 Turkish users, with censored topics including politicians and the Aydin Dogan media group. In mid-July, Twitter deleted the accounts of several Japanese artists in response to a complaint from the Russian government that their works were pornographic. Earlier this year, Twitter suspended conservative commentator Janet Bloomfield and manmade-global-warming denier Steven Goddard for no apparent reason other than their beliefs.
Twitter has also been accused of targeting citizen journalists for reporting news that offends powerful interests. Vicki Pate of Re-Newsit was banned from Twitter after posting a satirical cartoon of attorney Benjamin Crump. Pate had written about the financial dealings of Black Lives Matter activist Shaun King, a business partner in the Upfront Foundation with Twitter director of innovation Claire Diaz-Oritz. RadioNewz was suspended from Twitter after reporting on Pate's suspension. In May, Twitter banned Chuck C. Johnson of GotNews for soliting donations "to taking out" Black Lives Matter protester Deray McKesson with a future expose.
Twitter banned minor Youtube celebrity LeoPirate shortly after LeoPirate reported on leaked internet chat logs revealing the past pedophilic tendencies of Nicholas Nyberg, the administrator of the video game music website FFShrine who currently writes for feminist websites under the pen name Sarah Butts. Twitter also banned the account of Encyclopedia Dramatica for reporting on the subject and briefly suspended former Washington Times assistant editor Robert Stacy McCain for linking to one of his own articles about it.
As previously mentioned on Soylent News, late last year Twitter suspended several accounts associated with opposition to the Atheism+ movement and the Gamergate scandal.
line 1, column 80: stray end tag (Score:1, Interesting)
Well, it's not the government doing it, so it's not really censorship.</sarcasm>
Re:line 1, column 80: stray end tag (Score:5, Insightful)
You also need to understand that for a small but vocal minority freedom of speech has been seriously deemphasized in favor of emotional comfort (safe spaces) and inclusivity--which is a stalking horse for bullying anyone deemed to be tainted by "privilege". They are very much in favor of drawing a line around freedom of speech to exclude anything they consider "hate speech" or "problematic speech". Their definition for these categories is so broad, and so fluid, that granting them control over this vetting process amounts to handing them carte blanch to veto anyone's human rights on a whim.
This isn't liberalism, it's authoritarianism, and real liberals who want to preserve liberal values like Freedom of Expression had better stand up and object to this behavior. These horribly illiberal policies simply have to lose. The edifice of human rights is built on the foundation of Free Expression and if we lose that foundation we are doomed. There's nothing that can't be taken away from you once you've lost the freedom to object. This is serious stuff, and it matters even if the specific skirmishes appear to be happening in rather trivial cultural spaces. Who cares about video games and sci-fi books? You should, because one day they'll come for something YOU do care about [dancerscode.com] and your ranks of allies will be that much thinner for your inaction.
Climate change is real and primarily caused by human activity.
Parent
SJW's at it again (Score:3, Funny)
What kind of person doesn't love puppies? What kind of person kicks puppies? Well, that's tolerance for you!
We've been wishing Jews a "Merry Christmas" for about 2000 years. They don't shoot, bomb, or behead us in response.
Shut up (Score:0)
Twitter is not a government. It's not even an ISP. You post your twatty bits on their system at their pleasure.
Twitter really make people dumber, don't they.
"Social media is just a playground! Who cares?" (Score:4, Insightful)
The reality is that social media and internet news outlets are places where the majority of young people get their news, and that is not going to change any time soon. If you, reader, think it's unimportant now, just wait until those young people do things like get out and vote for policies that will affect your retirement (or whatever is left of it.) If you don't want to hear about the corruption, censorship, and shady business practices that are **deliberately and maliciously** following a common trajectory to skew the minds of future voters and members of society in general at the behest of Unknown Actors, YOU are the one who is in need of a reality check, not people who are "angry about Twitter." I care about #Gamergate and what it stands for because I care about the future of my country. Meaning, the freedom of my information and the objectivity of the perspectives of my peers. High quality, verifiable information should be valued regardless of "side," and if you don't care about those topics or think those concerns are "childish," you are the problem.
So long as the internet is open and free, social media has the potential to be much more effective at denoting the truth than traditional media has been in the past. Traditional news outlets have not been bothered by gadflies for far too long, and they are subject to much more sinister and deliberate bias by the powerful elite. It can't be reconciled that somebody could claim to care about the quality of their information and simultaneously not want to take the opportunity to improve a form of information sharing, the Internet, and therefore social media.
Way to ruin your brand, and all for the SJWs (Score:3, Insightful)
One might have supposed that Twitters greatest strength was the speed and ease with which people could communicate their views to the world. They could easily broadcast from a computer, from a smartphone, or even from an old fashioned dumb-phone. Many of the most interesting tweets were those that someone, somewhere would like to suppress.
Censorship destroys the one, central feature that made Twitter useful.
Driven by a desire to play schoolyard mom, Twitter wanted to make it's users be nice to each other. Guess what, people aren't nice. Watch any flame war on any forum. Using censorship to enforce niceness, and in some cases, to enforce SJW views, was simply idiotic. Twitter was already having revenue problems. Beginning with the first incident of censorship, it became a walking corpse. Like a ringed tree, it still looks healthy and will take some time to wither, but it is already dead.
Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.