Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday December 09 2015, @06:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the so-much-for-project-management dept.

A UK government report (board minutes from the Health & Social Care Information Centre) says that the National Health Service has £5 billion worth of Information Technology projects at high risk of failure:

The ratings are based on gateway reports assessing the risk of four IT projects this year. All are related as "red" or "amber/red" meaning successful delivery is either impossible or extremely unlikely. Those projects include the remaining electronic health records contracts with BT and CSC, due to end in 2015 and 2016.

According to the HSCIC report, the £2.3bn CSC Local Service Provider (LSP) programme has now been flagged as "red", up from "amber/red" when the Major Projects Authority last released its rating for September 2014. Both programmes were originally started in 2003/2004 and have had an extremely troubled history.

Other high-rated projects on the list included the £168m NHSmail2 programme, to provide secure email across the NHS, which has slipped from "amber" to "amber/red".

NHSmail2 is an upgrade to the NHS's Microsoft Exchange based email system. Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC) and BT Health London have managed IT services for different divisions of England (CSC manages the North, Midlands & Eastern cluster, BT manages the London cluster).

Previously: UK National Health Service Dumps Oracle For FOSS NoSQL


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Wednesday December 09 2015, @11:29AM

    by TheRaven (270) on Wednesday December 09 2015, @11:29AM (#273887) Journal

    after we screw up a project beyond endurance, the govt allow us tendering for the next major project

    I think it's slightly improved recently, but it used to be even worse: If you have 'experience' with government contracting then this was considered a major benefit and your bid would be heavily weighted as a result. If you had taken 100 government contracts before, then you were very likely to get the next one, even if you had failed to deliver on any of them. This is why companies like EDS kept getting contracts, in spite of never managing to complete any of them successfully.

    --
    sudo mod me up
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 09 2015, @11:32AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday December 09 2015, @11:32AM (#273889)
    (I know. Just don't wanted to mention names)