Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday January 09 2016, @02:44AM   Printer-friendly
from the time-to-get-a-bigger-server dept.

El Reg reports

The US Copyright Office is asking the tech industry and members of the public to comment about the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), and in particular the rules governing copyright infringement.

Section 512 of the DMCA gives ISPs and internet hosts immunity from prosecution if material that infringes copyright, such as music tracks, is taken down promptly if the entity owning the rights to it protests. "Repeat infringers" are penalized.

[...] The DMCA was signed into law in 1998, and since then flaws have been consistently pointed out in the legislation, not least with section 512. So the Copyright Office wants to know how to improve things.

"The Office will consider the costs and burdens of the notice-and-takedown process on large- and small-scale copyright owners, online service providers, and the general public", the request reads.

"The Office will also review how successfully section 512 addresses online infringement and protects against improper takedown notices. To aid in this effort, and to provide thorough assistance to Congress, the Office is seeking public input on a number of key questions."

In the request for responses, the Office posits 28 questions it would like answered, including how the legislation is working in practice, what legal precedents are affecting its operation, and whether takedown notices are effective. It also asks for any academic studies on the matter.

[...] The guidelines for submissions will be posted on February 1 and the open period for comments ends on March 21, so there's plenty of time to get a submission ready. How much good this will do, however, remains to be seen.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by liquibyte on Saturday January 09 2016, @06:02PM

    by liquibyte (5582) on Saturday January 09 2016, @06:02PM (#287326) Homepage

    My statement does no such thing. The law is a farce, you know it, I know it, everyone knows it save the lobbyists that wrote it. You made an assumption that I was against copyright. I'm not, I'm against this law. Copyright existed long before DMCA and will likely exist, hopefully in its original form, after it.