Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Saturday July 30 2016, @02:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the yes-his-name-is-willy-wang dept.

Original URL:

Chinese conglomerate LeEco just spent $2 billion to get its foot in the door of the US television market.

Along with Samsung, Vizio has been one of the two most-popular TV brands in the US over the last few years. Vizio TVs are among CNET's most-recommended models.

The news, rumored for the last couple of weeks, came from Vizio founder and CEO William Wang on stage at a joint press event in Hollywood. Vizio's hardware and software businesses will be owned and operated as a wholly owned subsidiary of LeEco, while the Vizio's data business, Inscape, will be spun off.

[...] "Fourteen years ago, I mortgaged my house to start Vizio, and since then, it has grown into one of the most well-known and respected CE brands in North America. As an entrepreneur, I couldn't be more proud of what has been accomplished," said Wang.

ArsTechnica also notes:

Wang will still be connected to Vizio, however, by becoming chairman and CEO of Inscape, a separate business that will carry Vizio's controversial torch of mining TV viewers' data for advertising and other data-driven services. Wang will be a 51-percent stakeholder in Inscape, with LeEco owning the other 49 percent and licensing Inscape's offerings for Vizio products for 10 years.

-- submitted from IRC

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2016, @04:35PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2016, @04:35PM (#381984)

    This (commodity) might be true this year?

    ~5 years ago when we bought a ~42" we looked carefully at different models to see how well they handled objects moving quickly across the screen. There were big differences in the visual artifacts when the scene was moving/changing quickly -- just a guess, there were differences in how well/quickly they decompressed the image data? Wound up with a Samsung that happens to also be rated for 3D, although we've only watched a couple of 3D movies. It still has some odd visual problems, but not many.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2016, @05:29PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2016, @05:29PM (#381993)

    Ok, friend, don't take this as an insult, it's not.

    You're in the 10%.

    Not the 1%!

    But you still have the time and money and concentration and ability and taste to discern between movement with ghosting or none. You probably are a tech worker earning six figures. 90% of the US earns less than you and your partner. When they go in to walmart and there's a wall of TV and one is the size they want and is cheaper than the others at that size, it's probably the one they're getting.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2016, @09:26PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday July 30 2016, @09:26PM (#382060)

      Interesting comment, not sure why you care? You are correct that I often find the time to research purchases to get something that will do a good job of meeting my (perceived) needs. The expensive 42" Samsung replaced a 25" tube TV that I'd fixed a few times and was really sick of working on...

      According to this page, [] I'm just outside the top 10% -- but that's on income only. Looking at net worth (own my house, nearing retirement age with savings, etc), I'm doing considerably better, well into the top 10%, []

      A long time ago I realized that I didn't want to grow old and rely on others (or future gov't benefits) to be comfortable, so savings has been a top priority.

      Anyone know of a better calculator for this stuff?