Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday December 29 2016, @09:31AM   Printer-friendly
from the yellow-and-blue-make-green dept.

Using ultrafast imaging of moving energy in photosynthesis, scientists have determined the speed of crucial processes for the first time.

This should help scientists understand how nature has perfected the process of photosynthesis, and how this might be copied to produce fuels by artificial photosynthesis.

During photosynthesis, plants harvest light and, though a chemical process involving water and carbon dioxide, convert this into fuel for life.

A vital part of this process is using the light energy to split water into oxygen and hydrogen. This is done by an enzyme called Photosystem II. Light energy is harvested by 'antennae', and transferred to the reaction centre of Photosystem II, which strips electrons from water. This conversion of excitation energy into chemical energy, known as 'charge separation', is the first step in splitting water.

It was previously thought that the process of charge separation in the reaction centre was a 'bottleneck' in photosynthesis - the slowest step in the process - rather than the transfer of energy along the antennae.

Marius Kaucikas, Karim Maghlaoui, Jim Barber, Thomas Renger and Jasper J van Thor, Ultrafast infrared observation of exciton equilibration from oriented single crystals of photosystem II will be published in Nature Communications. DOI: 10.1038/NCOMMS13977


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Offtopic) by Ayn Anonymous on Thursday December 29 2016, @07:01PM

    by Ayn Anonymous (5012) on Thursday December 29 2016, @07:01PM (#447171)

    is here: http://dx.doi.org.sci-hub.cc/10.1038/NCOMMS13977 [sci-hub.cc]

    Don't support the parasite publisher.
    Support Sci-hub https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sci-Hub [wikipedia.org]

    Every time you spend money, you're casting a vote for the kind of world you want.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   0  
       Offtopic=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Offtopic' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 29 2016, @11:15PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 29 2016, @11:15PM (#447223)

    If you bothered to click the original link provided in TFA you would perhaps have noticed that the Nature Communications article is open access without weasling through sci-hub

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by martyb on Friday December 30 2016, @05:04AM

    by martyb (76) Subscriber Badge on Friday December 30 2016, @05:04AM (#447294) Journal

    This is not a new discussion. See the replies to an earlier post of yours. [soylentnews.org]

    This is NOT negotiable for us. We, as a site, cannot in any way condone or suggest or even hint at a way of bypassing a journal paywall.

    We are an entirely volunteer organization. Nobody gets paid anything for working here. I have personally donated several thousand hours of my limited free time — others have, too. We have a shoestring budget which just barely covers our operational costs.

    There may be no immediate cost ($) to YOU to download a journal article that way. But, if a party were to "lawyer up" and challenge US for suggesting it... we cannot afford a lawyer to defend against such a charge. You might as well kiss this site good-bye.

    Is THAT what you want?

    --
    Wit is intellect, dancing.