Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday January 30 2017, @11:14PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-separation-of-powers dept.

From the what-separation-of-powers department:

The Department of Homeland Security has an update on the entry ban:

The Department of Homeland Security will continue to enforce all of President Trump's Executive Orders in a manner that ensures the safety and security of the American people. President Trump's Executive Orders remain in place—prohibited travel will remain prohibited, and the U.S. government retains its right to revoke visas at any time if required for national security or public safety. President Trump's Executive Order affects a minor portion of international travelers, and is a first step towards reestablishing control over America's borders and national security.

The NY Post adds:

The ACLU is getting "multiple reports" that federal customs agents are siding with President Trump — and willfully ignoring a Brooklyn federal judge's demand that travelers from seven Muslim countries not be deported from the nation's airports.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by dry on Tuesday January 31 2017, @02:12AM

    by dry (223) on Tuesday January 31 2017, @02:12AM (#460949) Journal

    In which case the proper course of action is to go to a higher court and get the stay reversed, rather then ignore the Judge.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 1, Troll) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday January 31 2017, @02:21AM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Tuesday January 31 2017, @02:21AM (#460958) Homepage Journal

    Normally I'd agree but these judges made this ruling with every intention of it being overturned. They're simply trying to buy time for immigrants to return because when they do the order and the law it's based on no longer apply. They knowingly made illegal rulings for strategic reasons and such rulings should be ignored.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 31 2017, @05:31AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 31 2017, @05:31AM (#461066)

      All the judges are a bunch of SJWs. ::rolleyes::
      And this from the guy who claims you gotta have "world class critical thinking skills" [theregister.co.uk] if you are a conservative on teh internets.

      • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday January 31 2017, @10:54AM

        by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Tuesday January 31 2017, @10:54AM (#461146) Homepage Journal

        Four out of how many? Yeah, they're wrong and they knew they were wrong when they handed down the decisions. They didn't do it because they were right but to allow those outside of the country time to return.

        --
        My rights don't end where your fear begins.
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 31 2017, @01:19PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 31 2017, @01:19PM (#461176)

          Echo... Echo... Echo...

        • (Score: 2) by dry on Tuesday January 31 2017, @08:07PM

          by dry (223) on Tuesday January 31 2017, @08:07PM (#461403) Journal

          Four out of how many?

          Good question, how many Judges refused to grant a stay?

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 01 2017, @08:40PM

            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 01 2017, @08:40PM (#461779)

            zero

    • (Score: 2) by dry on Tuesday January 31 2017, @06:27PM

      by dry (223) on Tuesday January 31 2017, @06:27PM (#461350) Journal

      Are you sure that there are no conflicting laws, treaties, or something in the Constitution? Even if what you say is true, America is a common law jurisdiction, which means Judges interpret the law and can even make law at times. The way it works is the Judges decision stands unless a higher Judge overrides or the Legislature (Congress) overrides or in the most extreme case, the Constitution is amended.
      Just because some petty cop for hire doesn't agree with the Judge(s), doesn't mean that they're free to interpret the law and ignore it, at least if America is a country of law.