SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Common Dreams reports:
Proponents of an open internet are holding a rally on Monday [February 27] to mark the two-year anniversary of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) vote that enshrined net neutrality protections that the new Trump administration has already begun eroding.
The 3pm event in Washington, D.C [was] backed by the Color of Change, National Hispanic Media Coalition, Center for Media Justice, and Free Press, and will feature the FCC's only Democratic commissioner, Mignon Clyburn.
[...] According to Timothy Karr, senior director of strategy for Free Press, "No FCC chair over the past 40 years has been so bent on undermining the agency's public-service mission and destroying the safeguards on which hundreds of millions of Americans rely."
Laying out the stakes, Max Anderson, coordinator for Human Rights Watch's general counsel's office, wrote last week:
Should net neutrality be scrapped in the U.S., it will enable service providers to throttle internet speeds or block access to websites based on commercial deals they cut with media providers. That would undermine freedom of expression and access to information. Once these practices have been established, it's a short step to other human rights consequences. Governments that already attempt to stifle lawful online expression will welcome a new tool for silencing critics. The FCC should retain its good example to the world and enforce net neutrality. If the internet stands a chance of enabling the realization of human rights, then access needs to be nondiscriminatory and in line with human rights in the widest sense.
[...] So, what can people do?
"The short answer is to raise hell", said Craig Aaron, CEO of Free Press, to Mercury News columnist Troy Wolverton.
"Net neutrality is an issue that a lot of people care about--millions and millions more than the FCC ever expected", Aaron said. "We need to hear from those people again."
The good old days: U.S. Appeals Court Upholds Net Neutrality Rules in Full
What's that? You thought we fought this one before? FCC Extends Net Neutrality Comment Period (Again)
(Score: 4, Informative) by butthurt on Wednesday March 01 2017, @03:56AM (9 children)
Ajit Pai, the new chairperson of the FCC, spoke about net neutrality on Tuesday at a conference in Barcelona.
https://variety.com/2017/biz/news/fcc-net-neutrality-aji-pai-tom-wheeler-1201998906/ [variety.com]
http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/columnist/baig/2017/02/28/fcc-chairman-calls-light-touch-regulation-net-neutrality-target/98515458/ [usatoday.com]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @06:09AM (8 children)
From what I've been reading the FCC will be gutted. Net neutrality is done.
I imagine the abuses are about to begin .. no more regulations .. anywhere
(Score: 5, Informative) by NotSanguine on Wednesday March 01 2017, @06:36AM (7 children)
From what I've been reading the FCC will be gutted. Net neutrality is done.
I imagine the abuses are about to begin .. no more regulations .. anywhere
WTF is wrong with you? If you need mommy to step in, then you're a loser and you deserve to die. Whether it be tainted food, killer pharmaceuticals (think Vioxx or laetrile), pulmonary complications from air pollution, water tainted with runoff from coal mines/chemical plants/etc. If you're not rich, there's obviously something wrong with you. You are not worth a damn. You should just kill yourself.
If you're not a winner, then you don't even deserve scraps. So quit whining to mommy gub'mint and make your billion dollars. Cheeto Jesus did. If you can't, it's because you're an inferior form of life that deserves to be put down in the harshest way possible.
As for net neutrality, where's the good in that? If I can't make a buck selling your privacy, then something is horribly wrong.
You seem to think you matter. I bet L'Orange spends more on chips and dip than you make in a year. Which means you don't count. Get with the program, moron!
No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @07:11AM
Tripping already?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @02:04PM (5 children)
I tried, and you bleeding heart asshole fucks stopped me.
MAKE UP YOUR DAMN MIND ALREADY!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @03:15PM
That's because you chose a method where no one profits. Book a space trip complete with space walk, and then while in space open the helmet of your space suit. That way everyone can profit from your suicide. First, the space company you paid for the trip. Next, the media companies that not only have the sensational news of the first suicide in free space, but additionally can place lots of opinion pieces about whether it is ethical to do suicide that way, whether something should be done to prevent further suicides of that sort, whether the company should have noticed your plan and stopped you, whether private space travel is good, after all, and so on. Also, they will be able to speculate whether you went to space in order to commit suicide, or if you became suicidal only after entering space, which can then spawn the topic of whether going to space may wreck your mind, well, you see, the possibilities are endless. Of course there will be books written about the incident, Hollywood will at some point turn it into a movie, conspiracy theorists will speculate whether extraterrestrials made you do it, or if it was just plain old mind manipulation rays from the government, applied through a nearby secret satellite …
(Score: 2) by Grishnakh on Wednesday March 01 2017, @03:41PM (3 children)
Someone who thinks poor people should just kill themselves is not a "bleeding heart". That's a textbook definition of a Christian conservative.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @09:17PM
No. Christian conservatives are less likely to be pro-suicide. They tend to regard it as a sin.
Those who follow catholic teachings, as well as many that are closely related, regard it is succumbing to despair.
Any theologians who can give us chapter and verse?
(Score: 2) by butthurt on Wednesday March 01 2017, @10:17PM (1 child)
In Christian theology charity is the greatest of the three theological virtues.
-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charity_%28virtue%29 [wikipedia.org]
Actual rewards may vary and are subject to availability and other terms.
(Score: 3, Informative) by Grishnakh on Wednesday March 01 2017, @11:45PM
Wrong Christians. You're talking about some kind of mythical Christian that either doesn't exist any more (and probably never did in great numbers anyway), or maybe exists in some other country. Here in America, Christian conservatives are all big fans of Ayn Rand and think that anyone who can't afford healthcare should be left on the street to die. America's Christians all go to giant mega-churches in their gigantic SUVs and sip on Starbucks drinks while the preacher tells them how rich people are rich because God loves them more.
(Score: 0, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @05:26AM (10 children)
Net neutrality IN THE CROSSHAIRS.
Proponents of an open internet
vote that enshrined net neutrality protections
new Trump administration has already begun eroding
so bent on undermining the agency's public-service mission and destroying the safeguards on which hundreds of millions of Americans rely
.... I could carry on, but I'm sure you get the idea.
Funny thing is, I'm a proponent of net neutrality - in fact, I'm a proponent of an opaque net design, so that neutrality is the only option. But then I get fed tripe like this, as if I were too weak-minded to choose the side of gleaming righteousness, defended by a harried band of underdog paladins against the ravening orcs of Mord ... I mean, DC.
Come on. Try to at least get neutral enough in the stories that I'm not embarrassed to agree with you, maybe?
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @07:01AM
What's your gripe? Given what they're reporting on - the deliberate and willful dismantling of a public good - this is remarkably unbiased headlining.
(Score: 2) by MostCynical on Wednesday March 01 2017, @08:29AM (4 children)
Classic method of rationalising awful things - convince yourself (and, maybe, others) that anyone who is telling about how crap things are is being irrational - as you are the epitome of rational, thinkjng man. "look, the sun is still coming up, everything is not that bad!"
"I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @03:17PM
But the scientists turned the sun into a giant nuclear reactor, and now people are getting cancer from it! ;-)
(Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday March 01 2017, @04:16PM (1 child)
mumble mumble Ayn Rand mumble mumble rational self-interest mumble mumble Fuck You Got Mine
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @10:12PM
Eejit Pie is a corporate shill and if someone claims otherwise with a straight face, then I have a beautiful bridge to sell them. I suspect quite a few Americans who voted for Trump didn't realise they'd get the Party of Personal Responsibility (aka fuck you, I got mine) too.
(Score: 3, Informative) by Zz9zZ on Wednesday March 01 2017, @05:18PM
AC specifically stated they are in favor of Net Neutrality. I am also tired of verbose emotional rhetoric in articles, its a cheap propaganda trick that treats people like children (rightfully so it would seem sometimes) and journalists should rise above it. That said, the quotes AC selected are far from the extreme edge of the spectrum... could be a troll... "Now I agree with this, but just listen to how stupid these people are!"
~Tilting at windmills~
(Score: 2, Disagree) by linkdude64 on Wednesday March 01 2017, @03:33PM (2 children)
Ironically it seems the political side who most vehemently supports "Net neutrality" are apparently the least able to remain objective and neutral when it comes to politics.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Wednesday March 01 2017, @07:01PM (1 child)
That's not irony, Allanis. To vehemently support something is to lose neutrality, by definition.
(Score: 2) by linkdude64 on Friday March 03 2017, @08:58PM
Irony is defined as, "the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning." Doesn't the statement "I support net neutrality" fit that description? Genuinely not sure - I have had a long day.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @03:57PM
I'll grant you the language is a bit more verbose than needed, but compared to some other articles I've seen it is downright mellow. Hardcore environmentalist articles are 10x worse, and conservative articles spew so much more hatred and emotional language. Same level of ridiculous but centered on anger. Net neutrality isn't some liberal fantasy you knobs.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 01 2017, @01:28PM
Plan A:
Couple content to delivery into a great monolith and gain power and profit.
Examples include radio,tv, cable, telco, newspaper, music, and Hollywood.
Quite a formidable group.
Plan B:
Decouple content from delivery and let a bunch of new, upstarts gain traction.
Examples include the ISP's and content folks.
It turns out, a much more formidable group. (Just ask the record industry.)
Plan C:
The guys from plan B get comfortable and tired of pesky new startups nipping at their heels.
They see the wisdom in plan A and find a way to make it so.
The lesson here should be that big is bad for the little guy.
It doesn't matter if it is big business, big labor, or big government.
The Wild West style of the evolving Internet has been an equalizer for the little guy.
The FCC is enabling new monoliths to put things back to the usual non-equal state.
Well, it was fun while it lasted.