Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by mrpg on Friday June 23 2017, @04:16AM   Printer-friendly
from the next-evolutionary-step:-biosuits-for-fungi dept.

Have you ever heard of biofilms? They are slimy, glue-like membranes that are produced by microbes, like bacteria and fungi, in order to colonize surfaces. They can grow on animal and plant tissues, and even inside the human body on medical devices such as catheters, heart valves, or artificial hips. Biofilms protect microbes from the body's immune system and increase their resistance to antibiotics. They represent one of the biggest threats to patients in hospital settings. But there is good news - a research team led by the Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (RI-MUHC) and The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids) has developed a novel enzyme technology that prevents the formation of biofilms and can also break them down.

This finding, recently published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), creates a promising avenue for the development of innovative strategies to treat a wide variety of diseases and hospital-acquired infections like pneumonia, bloodstream and urinary tract infection. Biofilm-associated infections are responsible for thousands of deaths across North America every year. They are hard to eradicate because they secrete a matrix made of sugar molecules which form a kind of armour that acts as a physical and chemical barrier, preventing antibiotics from reaching their target sites within microbes.

"We were able to use the microbe's own tools against them to attack and destroy the sugar molecules that hold the biofilm together," says the study's co-principal investigator, Dr. Don Sheppard, director of the Division of Infectious Diseases at the MUHC and scientist from the Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program at the RI-MUHC. "Rather than trying to develop new individual 'bullets' that target single microbes we are attacking the biofilm that protects those microbes by literally tearing down the walls to expose the microbes living behind them. It's a completely new and novel strategy to tackle this issue."

No, this is not about movies on asexual reproduction shown in biology class, but removing an important impediment to anti-biotics.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday June 23 2017, @04:46AM (7 children)

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday June 23 2017, @04:46AM (#529836) Journal

    I RTFA to get this: where do they plan to use them and if the enzyme is specific to bacterial biofilms or also act on other membranes (because, you see, I have also discovered a great solution for biofilms: it is called drain-cleaner. Also works wonders in the drains from my toilet bowl, no biofilms after a brief treatment)

    All I could find:

    They have been working to combat biofilms for several years, focusing on two of the most common organisms responsible for lung infections: a bacterium called Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a fungus called Aspergillus fumigatus. Infections with these organisms in patients with chronic lung diseases like cystic fibrosis represent an enormous challenge in medical therapy.
    ...
    "We made these enzymes into a biofilm destroying machine that we can use outside the microbe where the sugar molecules are found," explains co-first study author Brendan Snarr, a PhD student in Dr. Sheppard's laboratory. "These enzymes chew away all of the sugar molecules in their path and don't stop until the matrix is destroyed."

    So, perhaps it'll stop... after all, the drain-cleaner stops too when it hits the plastic walls of the drain, but still... I wouldn't use it in my lungs.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/@ProfSteveKeen https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Friday June 23 2017, @05:06AM (1 child)

    by kaszz (4211) on Friday June 23 2017, @05:06AM (#529841) Journal

    Cremation also removes all bacteria and viruses, permanently. Cure successful, patient dead. Next? ;-)
    So yeah, I'm also curious as to what other stuff this might break down in the body..

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 23 2017, @05:35PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 23 2017, @05:35PM (#530105)

      Reminds me of the story of a doctor during the Civil War that had two patients dying under his care, one of cancer, the other of a flesh eating bacteria.

      He figured, hey, this guy has too much flesh (cancer), what would happen if...

      End result, cancer cured, sadly the guy died of flesh eating bacteria.

  • (Score: 2) by rleigh on Friday June 23 2017, @07:17AM (3 children)

    by rleigh (4887) on Friday June 23 2017, @07:17AM (#529883) Homepage

    Animal cells construct their extracellular matrix from proteins such as fibronectin and collagen. It's unlikely the enzymes for bacterial biofilm sugars would much affect them, so long as they were specific for the sugar structured in the biofilm.

    • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday June 23 2017, @07:28AM (2 children)

      by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday June 23 2017, @07:28AM (#529886) Journal

      Animal cells construct their extracellular matrix from proteins such as fibronectin and collagen.

      On which carbohydrates attaches by glycosylation - if my memory serves, this is the magic behind AB0 blood groups.

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/@ProfSteveKeen https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
      • (Score: 2) by MostCynical on Friday June 23 2017, @08:06AM (1 child)

        by MostCynical (2589) on Friday June 23 2017, @08:06AM (#529893) Journal

        so, do you lose your blood type antigens (and then get all the transfusion-of-wrong-blood problems), or do you just get the blood breaking down (in the absence of the structure provided by the sugar molecules)?

        blood attacking blood ("clumping"), or, just, death...?
        http://mentalfloss.com/article/59644/how-blood-type-determined [mentalfloss.com]

        --
        "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
        • (Score: 2) by Taibhsear on Friday June 23 2017, @07:41PM

          by Taibhsear (1464) on Friday June 23 2017, @07:41PM (#530198)

          Hypothetically speaking if the biofilm destroying enzyme just cleaved the sugars off of the blood cells it would essentially just temporarily turn your blood cells into type O, which is nearly a universal donor (ie it doesn't react to type A or type B blood cells). It wouldn't turn your type A cells to B or vice versa so it shouldn't cause clumping/clotting. (There are other factors in addition to blood type that can cause reactions though so I'd have to go review to state with certainty.)

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by tfried on Friday June 23 2017, @09:32AM

    by tfried (5534) on Friday June 23 2017, @09:32AM (#529931)

    I did not find any in-depth info, and it's unlikely I would have understood it, either. But this bit from the article:

    These enzymes are the first strategy that has ever been effective in eradicating mature biofilms, and that work in mouse models of infection

    suggests that their enzymes are in fact more targeted than drain-cleaner. Well, no explicit mention about the mice' survival rate, but I'll give them the benefit of the doubt that it's above disastrous, at least.