Why can we talk about PISA results, comparing the performance of students in school, but we are not allowed to talk about differences in IQ? Bring this subject up, and you are immediately accused of racism. And yet. And yet, if there are substantial differences in intellectual capability, might this not explain some of the world's problems?
An update of a massive "study of studies" is underway; this article summarizes the work to date, and provides links to the work in progress. A quick summary of the answers to the questions no one dares ask:
In the first instance, it doesn't even matter why there are differences. They may be genetic, or disease related, or nutrition related, or something else. If these differences are real (and the evidence is pretty strong that they are), then we need to deal with them. Imagine if the low IQs in Africa turn out to be fixable - what would the impact be, if we could raise the IQ of an entire continent by 30 points?!
Sticking our collective heads in the sand, because the topic is not PC, is not going to solve any problems.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 03 2017, @02:01AM (1 child)
... because blacks (as a whole) always score the lowest.
Not like a little lower, but A LOT lower.
Everyone knows that if IQ were not a racist measurement, blacks would score the same as everyone else.
Do I have to explain the obvious?
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 03 2017, @10:42AM
Yes, you fucking racist! And, you will also have to explain why you got punched in the face by people with lower IQ. Did you not, with your superior intelligence, see that coming? Guess not!