An arXiv preprint suggests that evidence of intelligent (or trashy) life could be found by looking for space junk:
Its author, Héctor Socas-Navarro, spends most of his time at the Canary Islands Institute of Astrophysics in Spain studying the sun. But he was struck by a weird side effect of the ring of active and retired satellites circling Earth: it's a little bit opaque. And the more satellites we throw up there, the more opaque it gets. He realized that if we—or any technologically advanced aliens out there—build enough satellites, they'll eventually become dense enough to leave a faint shadow around the planet when it passes in front of a star.
And that's awfully convenient given that one of the best ways we have of spotting alien planets is by staring at their stars and waiting for tiny dips in brightness as planets pass in front of them. Essentially, Socas-Navarro's new paper proposes, if aliens have put enough satellites into orbit around their planet, we'll be able to spot the faintly opaque bubble before and after we spot the brightness dip of the planet itself.
The scale of the endeavor would be a real challenge for the aliens, however, since this idea relies on between 10 billion and one trillion satellites. "It's like building the pyramids," Avi Loeb, an astronomer at Harvard University, told New Scientist. "Each building block is easy, but putting it together is the hard engineering task."
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 09 2018, @12:56PM
Life on this planet has been around for a very long time compared to human recorded history.
What makes us say that we are the first to get to space in this solar system?
The pseudo-science 'search' assumes that ET's rise to space overlaps us in time.
The odds require ET to be around a very long time in order for us to see him.
What makes us think that we'll still be able to do space in even a short 10,000 years?
The 'what' is the arrogance of humans as a species.
It seems likely that same 'what' is going to do us in long before ET gets to say hi.