Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday March 09 2018, @02:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the going-to-need-lots-of-volunteers-to-build-the-block-list dept.

Rhode Island is the latest US state to discuss mandatory censorship of web content, at first targeting pornography:

Rhode Island Democratic state Senators Frank Ciccone (@senatorciccone) and Hanna Gallo (@hannagallo27) have proposed grandstanding, unworkable legislation, "Relating to Public Utilities and Carriers—Internet Digital Blocking" which would mandate the state's ISPs to identify all the pornography on the [I]nternet, and then block it for all Rhode Islanders, unless those Rhode Islanders specifically requested their porn to be unblocked and paid $20 for the privilege.

These proposals fly in the face of the observation that automated pornography filters don't work and that even the manual ones are neither practical, reliable, nor scalable.

Source : Rhode Island proposes blocking all online porn and charging $20 to unblock it. Boing Boing.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by DannyB on Friday March 09 2018, @05:47PM (4 children)

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 09 2018, @05:47PM (#650117) Journal

    Read Song of Solomon [biblegateway.com].

    Read Ezekiel chapter 23 [biblegateway.com]. Be sure to check out verse 20, but everything leading up to it is quite a read.

    In Genesis 19 [biblegateway.com] we have a lovely story of how Lot's daughters [wikipedia.org] got him drunk and then raped him so they could become pregnant. (Although they did it on two consecutive nights so that each daughter got a fair turn.)

    --
    Thank goodness the 1st amendment forces people to listen to you and agree with you.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Friday March 09 2018, @09:01PM (3 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Friday March 09 2018, @09:01PM (#650227) Journal

    If Lot were drunk enough not to recognize his own daughters, wouldn't he be too drunk to get it up? I've read that men can't, er, perform when they're good and hammered.

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    • (Score: 3, TouchĂ©) by DannyB on Friday March 09 2018, @09:17PM

      by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Friday March 09 2018, @09:17PM (#650234) Journal

      Maybe he thinks his daughters are hot and would want to date them. Like the president says.

      --
      Thank goodness the 1st amendment forces people to listen to you and agree with you.
    • (Score: 2) by Taibhsear on Friday March 09 2018, @09:51PM

      by Taibhsear (1464) on Friday March 09 2018, @09:51PM (#650251)

      I believe the kids these days call that "whiskey dick."

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 10 2018, @12:31AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Saturday March 10 2018, @12:31AM (#650315)

      You don't need to be erect to ejaculate. It's easier to do if you don't have half your penis cut off, as many Americans have, but that isn't a requirement. In those cases the easiest way is for soft ejaculations is through prostate stimulation.

      Sexual education especially sucks in USA.