Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Saturday October 06 2018, @08:10PM   Printer-friendly
from the let-'er-rip dept.

Brett Kavanaugh has been confirmed as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. The vote was 50-48 in favor of Kavanaugh.

Senators Collins, Flake, and Manchin had already announced their intentions to confirm Kavanaugh before the vote was held. Senator Lisa Murkowski, who was previously ready to vote "no", agreed to vote "present" instead so that Senator Steve Daines could attend his daughter's wedding instead of being present in the Senate to support Kavanaugh.

SCOTUSBlog: Kavanaugh confirmed as 114th justice
Nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Previously: SCOTUS's Justice Anthony Kennedy to Retire
President Trump Nominates Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the US Supreme Court
Trump's Supreme Court Pick: ISPs Have 1st Amendment Right to Block Websites

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 06 2018, @11:46PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 06 2018, @11:46PM (#745254)

    Garland was nominated to be a palatable choice for the Republican Senate. However, Republicans were too cowardly and conniving to even hold Garland's confirmation hearings. By making it an election issue, they may have gotten more evangelical turnout in 2016. Either way, the bet paid off. Now they get to live with the consequences: total war over every nomination. Eventually, Democrats will regain the Senate and possibly get their revenge.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Informative=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday October 07 2018, @02:47PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday October 07 2018, @02:47PM (#745496) Journal

    Yes, eventually. But, what does "eventual" mean, exactly? Two years? Ten years? Twenty? It's not outside the realms of possibility that the D's don't control the senate for fifty years. Unlikely, but possible.

    Meanwhile, the Dems have introduced the idea that a SC nominee (or any other appointee who needs confirmation) can be blocked with rumors and/or false accusations regarding his conduct as a youth.

    I'm reminded of a schoolmate. Big, strapping young man, borderline bashful, but a helluva fullback. Fairly smart guy, managed to keep high C and low B grades in all his classes without studying. He was called "Wheee" by everyone. It seems that when he was being potty trained, he stood in the commode, pulled the handle, and hollered "Wheeee" as the water sloshed around his feet.

    Do you reckon that might put the stops to his confirmation, if he should be nominated to some position? Surely playing in the toilet is a sign of mental illness, and/or conservatism.

    As someone has already noted, you guys are sore losers.

    --
    We're gonna be able to vacation in Gaza, Cuba, Venezuela, Iran and maybe Minnesota soon. Incredible times.