Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday February 06 2021, @02:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the turning-back-the-clock dept.

Physicists to look for quantum time dilation inside nuclear reactor:

We're all too familiar with the inexorable march of time, but why exactly it flows in one direction remains a mystery of physics. A few years ago Australian physicist Joan Vaccaro proposed a new quantum theory of time, and now a team is planning to test the hypothesis by searching for time dilation in a nuclear reactor.

[...] But according to Vaccaro's quantum theory of time, entropy is more of a symptom of the flow of time, rather than the root cause. She uses the analogy of a tree blowing in the wind – while the leaves (entropy) may appear to be shaking the tree, they aren't responsible for the motion themselves, but are the result of another force (wind). In this new theory, the "wind" is created by time reversal symmetry violations (T violations).

Vaccaro points out that physics regards space and time as being interconnected, as spacetime. But nature seems to treat the two differently. From experience we know, for instance, that objects are localized in space – a particular book or tree or person can only be found in one specific spot. Yet that's not the case for time – that same book or tree or person can be found in a range of times. Because spacetime is one thing, theoretically objects localized in space should be localized in time as well, popping in and out of existence.

Obviously that's not our experience with the universe, and it goes against the laws of motion and conservation of mass. But, Vaccaro proposes, T violations make it impossible for matter to remain localized in time. Because of T violations, objects don't appear and disappear at random, they exist continuously. What we know of as the laws of motion and conservation of mass are instead symptoms of these T violations.

Vaccaro proposes that something on the quantum scale creates T violations locally, and if enough of them occur it could begin to have a wider effect on the macro scale – essentially producing the dynamics we see as time moving forward.

Vaccaro's quantum theory of time is a pretty major departure from accepted physics, and she freely admits that it's controversial and may very well be wrong. But importantly, like any good hypothesis there's a way to test it experimentally.

And the results could be fascinating. It's almost expected that there would be a null result, returning us to the established path of physics. But if the experiment does find evidence of time dilation, it could be a huge breakthrough. That's a big "if," but one worth at least checking.

[...] "All I've said could completely be wrong," Vaccaro says in a video presentation from 2017 (below). "But it's not me that decides whether this is a good theory or not – it's nature. And if nature is showing this, this would be quite remarkable. So this is where the efforts should be, I think."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by beernutz on Saturday February 06 2021, @11:50PM

    by beernutz (4365) on Saturday February 06 2021, @11:50PM (#1109826)

    Here is the source article if you want a different place to read it:
    https://www.ansto.gov.au/news/neutrinos-atomic-clocks-and-an-experiment-to-detect-a-time-dilation [ansto.gov.au]

    Though i have to wonder what site you visited? The one linked at the top of this article had a serif typeface, and the color while not black maybe was still extremely easy to read. rgb(51,51,51) according to chrome dev tools.
    As for the size, control key and plus seem to work fine for me. Though i browse at 125% everywhere anyway, so i did not have to increase it at all.

    One final note: The typeface on soylent news is Sans-serif. Yet you still managed to read the article ok, right?

    I don't mean to be overly critical, it just seems like your criticisms are a little harsh.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2