Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Sunday September 11 2022, @04:36PM   Printer-friendly
from the ten-years-away dept.

The director of the Korean research centre said the 2020 experiment marked an 'important turning point' in making commercial nuclear fusion reactors:

A fusion device in South Korea made a breakthrough when it maintained a temperature nearly seven times hotter than the sun for 20 seconds.

The Korea Superconducting Tokamak Advanced Research (KSTAR) reactor managed to maintain an ion temperature of more than 100m degrees Celsius "without plasma edge instabilities or impurity accumulation". The heat of centre of the sun is estimated to be around 15m degrees Celsius.

The record was hit in 2020, but the associated research paper was published this month in the journal Nature after being peer-reviewed.

The researchers noted that other fusion devices have briefly managed plasma at temperatures of 100m degrees Celsius or higher. However, none of them managed to maintain this for 10 seconds or longer.

[...] "KSTAR's success in maintaining the high-temperature plasma for 20 seconds will be an important turning point in the race for securing the technologies for the long high-performance plasma operation, a critical component of a commercial nuclear fusion reactor in the future."

The final goal of the KSTAR is to succeed in a continuous operation of 300 seconds with an ion temperature higher than 100m degrees Celsius by 2025.

I'm noticing the use more and more in these kind of articles of odd or incorrect units, here using "m" for million. What's up with that? [hubie]

Journal Reference:
Han, H., Park, S.J., Sung, C. et al. A sustained high-temperature fusion plasma regime facilitated by fast ions. Nature 609, 269–275 (2022). 10.1038/s41586-022-05008-1


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by hubie on Sunday September 11 2022, @07:27PM (1 child)

    by hubie (1068) Subscriber Badge on Sunday September 11 2022, @07:27PM (#1271231) Journal

    That is interesting, though not very consistent (it also says MW for megawatt and mW for milliwatt). It has mm for millimeters, but you're not supposed to use m for meters (except for sporting events), but km is acceptable. It doesn't explain pc being used for percent, though, as I've seen in other stories. The style guide says to use % for that.

    I thought that page was ridiculously long for a style guide, then realized that was only for the letter "m"! I hope they have software to check enforcement for all that stuff.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by RamiK on Sunday September 11 2022, @08:27PM

    by RamiK (1813) on Sunday September 11 2022, @08:27PM (#1271241)

    That is interesting, though not very consistent...I hope they have software to check enforcement for all that stuff.

    Well, what you have to keep in mind is that the authors of such style guides that require human proofing happen to earn their wages as editors...

    --
    compiling...