Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Blackmoore on Wednesday December 10 2014, @10:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the burn-baby-burn dept.

Phys.org has a report regarding the use of molybdenum sulfide (MoS2) [sic - I think that should be molybdenum disulfide] as a catalyst when spliting water atoms into hydrogen and oxygen:

Hydrogen could be an important source of clean energy, and the cleanest way to produce hydrogen gas is to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. But the catalyst currently used to facilitate this water-splitting reaction is platinum. And that's a problem. When an electric current is run through water, it can split some of the water molecules. A catalyst lowers the amount of energy needed to split those molecules, and platinum is really, really good at this. But platinum is also really, really expensive – much too expensive for widespread use in hydrogen production.

So, researchers have long viewed molybdenum sulfide (MoS2) as a promising, much cheaper alternative to platinum. The drawback is that MoS2's catalytic performance is far worse than platinum's. To get around that problem, researchers have been trying to find ways to improve MoS2's catalytic performance. And now they may be on to something.

"The biggest stumbling block to improving MoS2's performance has been a lack of understanding of the connection between the material's performance and its composition and structure," says Linyou Cao, senior author of a new paper on the subject and a materials science and engineering researcher at NC State. "We're now able to shed some light on that connection."

In molybdenum sulfide, the ratio of sulfur atoms to molybdenum atoms can range from two to three. As a result, many researchers wondered if the precise composition of the material could affect its catalytic performance.

According to a new paper from Cao and his team, it doesn't. But the crystalline structure of the material does.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by MathCampbell on Friday December 12 2014, @05:09AM

    by MathCampbell (4930) on Friday December 12 2014, @05:09AM (#125378)

    Just a quick note ..

    Hydrogen could be an important source of clean energy,

    Hydrogen is NOT an energy source. It is an energy storage resource; there is not "free hydrogen" available to use; all hydrogen used for energy is being extracted from water, or from other compounds; this takes energy (more than is generated by burning hydrogen again), so in effect, hydrogen is an energy storage solution, NOT an energy source.

    You need to put more energy into extracting the stuff than you do using it. So all it really is is an energy storage possibility so you can generate a lot of power, say in the desert, with solar panels, then transfer that energy by using it liberate hydrogen, put it into a car and recoup some of that solar energy when it's dark and you're doing 60...
    Unless you're doing fusion I guess...