Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday December 13 2014, @01:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-award-winners-disagreed dept.

An article in the British Medical Journal maintains, based on analysis of the Darwin Awards, that men are far more likely to perform truly idiotic and dangerous acts than women.

From the article abstract:

Sex differences in risk seeking behaviour, emergency hospital admissions, and mortality are well documented. However, little is known about sex differences in idiotic risk taking behaviour. This paper reviews the data on winners of the Darwin Award over a 20 year period (1995-2014). Winners of the Darwin Award must eliminate themselves from the gene pool in such an idiotic manner that their action ensures one less idiot will survive. This paper reports a marked sex difference in Darwin Award winners: males are significantly more likely to receive the award than females (P < 0.0001). We discuss some of the reasons for this difference.

Non-technical summary available at the Washington Post and C|Net.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Ohiovr on Saturday December 13 2014, @10:40PM

    by Ohiovr (4904) on Saturday December 13 2014, @10:40PM (#125843)

    MIT: Male Idiot Theory. How about go fuck yourself feminazi theory? Enjoy your fucking dildos.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Overrated=1, Total=1

    Total Score:   0