Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday January 20, @05:06AM   Printer-friendly

KIT's Spinoff 'Digital Power Systems' Develops Ultralong-lived Industrial Power Supplies:

Switching power supplies are omnipresent in our daily life, may it be in households, offices, or industry. They convert the alternating current supplied into direct current for smartphones, laptops, charging stations of e-cars, and logistics and computing centers. However, conventional power supplies usually have to be exchanged after nine years of permanent operation. Digital Power Systems (DPS), a spinoff of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), has now developed and tested power supplies with a lifetime of 50 years.

Conventional switching power supplies are light and compact, but highly susceptible to failure due to the electrolyte capacitors they contain. Film capacitors are far more long-lived. So far, however, they have needed up to ten times more space. "We have now developed a digital control process, by means of which film capacitors can be used on smaller space," DPS Director Michael Heidinger says. [...]

[...] The novel digital control process allows for the use of film capacitors with a slightly increased space requirement only. For control purposes, a microprocessor is integrated in the power supply. It detects disturbing ambient impacts and balances large voltage fluctuations of the film capacitor. As a result, storage capacitors of smaller capacity are sufficient. Heidinger explains that powerful microprocessors have made this possible.

I've had to replace a number of electrolytic capacitors in several of my home appliances over the years, so I can appreciate this development, but do you think the concepts "lifetime of 50 years" and "integrated microprocessor" generally compatible?


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by hubie on Friday January 20, @05:47AM (14 children)

    by hubie (1068) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 20, @05:47AM (#1287694) Journal

    You did interpret my question correctly. Do you think these microprocessors will stand up to 50 years of industrial use? I, perhaps naively, assume processors prone to failure easier over time due to the crazy density of components on them, but my electronics expertise comes from the Heathkit age where components are big, soldering was thru-hole, and our traces were large.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 5, Interesting) by RS3 on Friday January 20, @07:43AM (6 children)

    by RS3 (6367) on Friday January 20, @07:43AM (#1287703)

    I really don't know a lot about longevity. Generally silicon manufacturing has been getting better, but some things seem less reliable, like RAM. It'll depend on operating conditions, including voltages, vibration, temperatures, etc.

    The density is only a problem where there are flaws in the silicon. Others here are more knowledgeable about silicon "chip" manufacturing, but I speculate that smaller feature sizes will cause flaws and imperfections in the silicon to fail more quickly. In other words, you'll know very quickly that it isn't going to last long. (I can expand on that if it doesn't make sense...)

    Most electronic parts that have internal flaws will fail in the first 40 hours or so, often called "infant mortality". Every electronics manufacturing / assembly operation I've been part of uses a 40 - 100 hours "burn-in" period. The product is then re-tested and shipped if all tests pass.

    In the 70s and 80s a good friend's dad worked building "hybrid" circuits that went into satellites that are still functioning perfectly, even with the radiation up there. "Hybrid" means: ICs, transistors, resistors, etc., in "raw" chip form bonded to a ceramic substrate, wire bonded together, and sealed with a lid.

    Other than RAM, I've almost never seen an IC or transistor just simply fail when it wasn't clobbered by some external problem, like voltage "spike", heat, vibration, short-circuit, etc.

    I have some things with ICs that are more than 50 years old. I have to think about it, but I know some of my older Tektronix scopes have ICs from the 60s and early 70s and they work very well.

    So I think it's very possible to function for more than 50 years if it's done right.

    • (Score: 5, Informative) by mhajicek on Friday January 20, @11:58AM

      by mhajicek (51) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 20, @11:58AM (#1287717)

      It's not uncommon for industrial CNC machines to last 30 years or more. That's not necessarily on all original electronics though; there's a strong market for refurbishing the boards.

      --
      The spacelike surfaces of time foliations can have a cusp at the surface of discontinuity. - P. Hajicek
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by hubie on Friday January 20, @01:27PM (1 child)

      by hubie (1068) Subscriber Badge on Friday January 20, @01:27PM (#1287723) Journal

      It's funny you mention Tek scopes because I was thinking about those when I typed that comment. We still have some of the old phosphor screen scopes kicking around and I know they'll fire right up and run, but to be fair, they haven't been running all this time. Actually one did run for a very long time, but that was because it was part of a timing setup where we were actually using the plug-in modules for pulse delay and a few other timing things and we still kept a bunch of the old modules around as 1-for-1 swap-ins if any of those pieces fail. (We tossed the last of our Polaroid camera hoods many years ago; I always loved to show those to the newbies to show we saved off our data "back in the day."). We've had newer scopes fail, but the repair there seems to be just give you a new card since scopes seem to be just Windows machines running a very fancy plug-in cards (or is it the other way, very fancy DSP cards with a plugin single board computer?).

      • (Score: 2) by RS3 on Saturday January 21, @04:26AM

        by RS3 (6367) on Saturday January 21, @04:26AM (#1287839)

        When I was a kid, maybe 10, my dad would borrow a Tek from time to time for me, so I fell in like with them then. I've tried many brands, but I got very spoiled.

        Most of them have analog power supplies, so most of the electrolytic caps are only seeing 120 Hz. Like you mentioned, they get minimal use. But many electrolytics, especially very old ones, can dry out just sitting unused, and then they stop working.

        I have one of the ones that use plugin modules. Someone gave it to me. It had a dead shorted tantalum cap that I found pretty quickly. They made an amazingly wide array of modules for those things.

        I have one USB "Hantek" that's mostly meant for automotive diagnosis, but can work for whatever. It has 8 BNC inputs. I forget the sample rate, but it's high enough for lots of stuff. I need to actually connect it to some sensors in my car and figure out what the heck is going on...

    • (Score: 4, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 20, @01:30PM (2 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 20, @01:30PM (#1287724)

      > some things seem less reliable, like RAM

      Just a short comment on this, a good friend used to work at a chip plant. One of his jobs was to analyze details from the production line to determine the potential life of RAM. For a hypothetical example, if the focus of some ion beam is slightly compromised in certain parts of the wafer, the chips cut from that area may work OK and pass burn-in...but won't last forever. The "worst" of these RAM chips got sold at low prices to video game console makers. Slightly better chips went to commodity PCs and the very best (closest tolerance manufacture) went to expensive, high reliability customers.

      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by RS3 on Saturday January 21, @04:31AM (1 child)

        by RS3 (6367) on Saturday January 21, @04:31AM (#1287840)

        Interesting they actually know there's an ion beam consistency problem. Hmmm. How to get the "good stuff"?

        Years ago I learned that Apple labeled hard drives were the best of the drives, so whenever buying used hard drives I look for the Apple logo on the label.

        • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 21, @02:36PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 21, @02:36PM (#1287895)

          > they actually know there's an ion beam consistency problem.

          My conversation was a long time ago, that was a hypothetical. What I do remember is that there are multiple sensors and data recording in every tool for every process step--temps, pressures, voltages, currents, etc. and also special test sites scattered around on every wafer designed to reveal process inconsistencies. It's hard to think of a process that really "wants" to be consistent, it sounded more like a herding cats problem as things drifted (very slightly, but with consequences). Given 6 weeks to process a wafer, a LOT of process data is collected and analyzed.

          > How to get the "good stuff"?

          From distant memory, I think the best stuff included expensive ceramic packaging...for mainframes. But in general, you get what you pay for--assuming you can find an honest retailer to deal with. I suspect that the good stuff is sold in large quantities, business-to-business. When a computer manufacturer has multiple product lines, the more expensive "business" or "hardened" versions likely have better quality chips too.

          Another friend had a favorite saying, "Software is hard, but hardware is harder."

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by mcgrew on Friday January 20, @07:25PM (4 children)

    by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Friday January 20, @07:25PM (#1287775) Homepage Journal

    Why shouldn't they, provided they were properly engineered? Steam locomotives manufactured in the 1880s had hundred year warrantees, and lots of moving parts!

    Planned obsolescence exists today. It didn't 150 years ago. There's no logical reason why any electronic component shouldn't last forever, or at least until it's run over by an automobile or a stray gamma ray hits a transistor. Back then, things were built to last as long as possible. Today, an item's lifetime is the first thing that's engineered.

    Only the most evil among us become billionaires.

    --
    Carbon, The only element in the known universe to ever gain sentience
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 20, @10:33PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 20, @10:33PM (#1287814)

      > There's no logical reason why any electronic component shouldn't last forever,

      Seems that you haven't worked in product testing and component qualification? Nothing is ever stationary, small changes in temperature make nearly everything grow or shrink. As soon as something changes size it pushes on whatever it's attached to and eventually things might start to crack. There are whiskers, little crystals that grow and short out circuit cards. Plastics out-gas and become brittle with age. Moisture condenses on cold surfaces and corrosion starts. The list goes on and on.

      • (Score: 3, Interesting) by RS3 on Saturday January 21, @04:37AM

        by RS3 (6367) on Saturday January 21, @04:37AM (#1287842)

        You're absolutely correct. However, ALL of those drawbacks can be overcome. You may not be familiar with spacecraft (and aircraft) design, component specifying, testing, hardening, shock mounting, shielding, conformal coating, and general electronics protection.

        The "whiskers" you refer to are a big problem with lead-free (tin-antimony) solders.

        Greed is a socioeconomic cancer.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Azuma Hazuki on Saturday January 21, @04:16PM (1 child)

      by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Saturday January 21, @04:16PM (#1287916) Journal

      Nothing can last forever because entropy...or, as it used to be put, "all which has form is void/emptiness." I imagine that even simple solid-state silicon products will eventually get warped or blown out just due to the sheer amount of electricity passing through them decade after decade. Saying that, though, yes, planned obsolescence is an obscenity.

      --
      I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
      • (Score: 3, Informative) by ChrisMaple on Sunday January 22, @06:47AM

        by ChrisMaple (6964) on Sunday January 22, @06:47AM (#1288026)

        I have a vague memory from about 40 years ago of some engineer from a semiconductor company complaining about the company's NMOS process. He claimed that one of the dopants (samarium?) would diffuse over time, giving the product a lifespan of only a couple of decades.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by Unixnut on Saturday January 21, @11:53AM (1 child)

    by Unixnut (5779) on Saturday January 21, @11:53AM (#1287876)

    I don't know if it qualifies as "industrial use", but one of my cars turned 40 years old in 2022. It still has the original ECU (8048 based), original caps, ICs, transistors, etc... and they all work perfectly, and an automotive environment is hard on electronics. Voltage spikes, extreme heat, cold, moisture, vibration, corrosion, etc...

    So yes, I see no reason why you can't build electrical systems that last 50 years. I don't think they will be built and designed, because the modern world is one of penny pinching bean counters, disposable consumerism and planned obsolescence.

    In such a world, building anything that will last 50+ years is seen as a waste of resources. Cars now are designed to last the length of the lease (about 5 years), then you buy a new one. Same applies to mobile phones, or pretty much anything else, simply because business realised they make more money if they force repeat customers every 2-5 years, rather than having a repeat customer every 20-50 years.

    • (Score: 2) by RS3 on Saturday January 21, @06:49PM

      by RS3 (6367) on Saturday January 21, @06:49PM (#1287934)

      I'm not surprised at all that your "old" ECU still works. It's really not that harsh an environment. Some ECUs are in the passenger compartment (many I've had over the years). Some are underhood, but they're in sealed boxes with very good sealed connectors. If water gets in, of course, things will corrode.

      Many ECUs, esp. older ones, were conformal coated (circuit board coating), so even if water gets in they'll probably keep going forever.

      A serious voltage spike, or intermittent wire short can fry a driver transistor. But there really aren't many serious voltage spikes happening in cars- the battery keeps them under control, and most electronics (semiconductors) in cars can withstand 60 or more volts.

      In electronics production, you might be surprised at how hot everything gets during soldering (wave, infrared, convection oven, etc.), so the heat isn't an issue (unless the ECU somehow lays on an exhaust system part!)

      But yes, I agree, it's all about "cost-cutting" - ever cheapening. I'm not sure that throwing everything away in 5 or less years is helping the economy or society in the long-run. We're scrapping things that could have been repaired, esp. if Victorian-era "build it to last" mentality was the rule when they were made.

      Plus everyone is addicted to having "NEW!". I feel that we (the whole world) are caught in an economic running-in-place trap. Rather than cure cancer, we're spending money on buying new cars, new everything, and throwing things that are mostly still good in landfills.

      Bottom line- as you allude to, short-term profit greed has slowly but surely taken over and metastasized into every corner of life.