The wild concept was put forward by a group of astrophysicists in a study published Wednesday in PLOS Climate. Benjamin Bromley, Sameer Khan, and Scott Kenyon theorized that a solar shield could be created to deflect the sun's rays from Earth.
Coal and sea salt were considered as materials that could be used in the shield, helping to dim the sun by as much as 2%, or around six days of sunlight per year, thereby lowering the Earth's temperature. But lunar dust turned out to be the ideal candidate as it is just the right size and composition for efficiently scattering sunlight away from our planet, said Bromley.
Another advantage of moon dust is that it would take much less energy to launch it from the lunar surface compared to earth-based launches, though it would still require an estimated 22 billion pounds of dust to be mined and loaded into a ballistic device such as a rail gun and fired. This would need to be performed regularly to maintain the shield as the dust would slowly disperse. An abrupt halt in the cooling of the earth could caused "termination shock," in which the planet rapidly heats up, writes The Guardian.
[...] The proposal isn't the first time someone has suggested using a physical object in space to address global warming. A 1,250-mile glass shield, trillions of spacecraft sporting umbrella-like shields, blasting dust off an asteroid, a raft of thin-film silicon bubbles, and space mirrors are some of the other space-based suggestions. There was also the space shield in the magnificently awful Highlander 2.
[...] "Nothing should distract us from reducing greenhouse gas emissions here on Earth," said Bromley. "Our strategy may just be a moonshot, but we should explore all possibilities, in case we need more time to do the work here at home."
Journal Reference:
Bromley BC, Khan SH, Kenyon SJ (2023) Dust as a solar shield. PLOS Clim 2(2): e0000133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000133
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Username on Monday February 13, @09:48AM (2 children)
I like my planet just how it is, habitable. No need to fix it when it isn't broken.
We'll never have the resources or tech to do this, but if we did, we should do it to a planet that isn't habitable, like venus.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 13, @12:35PM (1 child)
Wrong way to look at it. They are saying the planet is broken and we need to fix it.
(Score: 1, Troll) by Reziac on Monday February 13, @03:18PM
And they assume that 1) they are the only source of wisdom, and 2) they are infallible.
This isn't science, it's a death cult.
And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.