Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday April 21, @05:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the more-good-news-for-your-children-and-yourself dept.

It looks like the Paris Agreement is as dead as the fried chicken at my local deli.

At Paris, in 2015, the World agreed to limit the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius. The latest report of the EU's Climate Change Service shows (summary pdf) that this target has been royally breached, at least for Europe. Temperatures there, averaged over the last 5 years, have increased by 2.2 degrees celsius.

Europe, at least, has a climate change service to measure these things. As for the rest of the world, an extrapolation of the pattern shown in Figure 1c, here, indicates that, there too, demand for swimming pools and flood insurance will grow.

To illustrate the complexity of the problem, the heatwave in mid-July of 2022 was caused by hot air from the Sahara moving into Europe, driving temperatures above 40 degrees Celsius. By mid-August, a stationary high-pressure system with clear skies and weak winds took hold, and caused a second heatwave, which was made worse due to the soil being dried out by the mid-July event, and no rains since.

Events above the Sahara might have come a second time in play, here. Increasing temperatures lead to a stronger evaporation over sea, while the land heats up more. This results in a stronger temperature gradient, which draws rains deeper inland: heavier rainfalls now are reported in the central Sahara, in summer, with formerly dry valleys being put under four meters of water. This causes less Sahara dust in the atmosphere, and hence shields the land less from solar radiation: the EU's report mentions that 2022 surface solar radiation was the highest in a 40 year record, and part of a positive trend.

To end with a positive note, the EU ain't doing so bad, compared to Greenland: three different heatwaves in 2022, and an average September temperature more than 8 degrees Celsius higher than normal.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by quietus on Monday April 24, @08:58AM (1 child)

    by quietus (6328) on Monday April 24, @08:58AM (#1302766) Journal

    ...meaning we'll probably see even larger errors in those climate change models in the future than what we've seen to this point

    Intriguing. Isn't the general rule that, as a model becomes more sophisticated, its error variance becomes smaller?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Tuesday April 25, @02:08AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday April 25, @02:08AM (#1302938) Journal

    Isn't the general rule that, as a model becomes more sophisticated, its error variance becomes smaller?

    First I've heard of this rule. Sophistication which is just a variant of precision is orthogonal to accuracy.