Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday April 28, @10:11PM   Printer-friendly

The company divulged its supply chain emissions for the first time, and it’s the most polluting part of its business:

Tesla released its 2022 Impact Report this week, and it gives the clearest picture yet of the electric car company's carbon footprint. Tesla disclosed numbers on its supply chain emissions for the first time, which makes its overall carbon footprint much bigger than it has reported in the past.

Last year, the company only disclosed how much greenhouse gas pollution it generated from its direct operations and from customers charging their EVs. Altogether that was roughly equivalent to 2.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide. But that missed the big picture since supply chain pollution — considered indirect emissions — often make up a major chunk of a company's carbon footprint.

This year, Tesla finally released data on its supply chain emissions for 2022, which is equivalent to roughly 30.7 million tons of carbon dioxide. That's a huge change from what the company reported last year.

The disclosure really highlights how important it is to count up all of a company's direct and indirect emissions. It's especially pertinent with a fight brewing in the US between companies and the Securities and Exchange Commission over how much of those emissions ought to be reported under law.

A company's carbon footprint is usually divvied up into three main groups or "scopes." Scope 1 includes direct emissions from its own factories, offices, and vehicles. Scope 2 encompasses emissions from its electricity use, heating, and cooling. Scope 3 comprises all the other indirect emissions from supply chains and the lifecycle of the products a company makes. And there are 15 different categories of emissions within Scope 3 alone to give a sense of how wide-ranging it can be.

It's a common practice for companies to only share their Scope 1 and 2 emissions, which can make its carbon footprint appear much smaller than it actually is. Tesla's Scope 1 and 2 emissions, for example, only add up to 610,000 metric tons of CO2 in 2022. That's minuscule in comparison to the company's indirect Scope 3 emissions.

Last year, the SEC proposed rules that would mandate that all public companies share their Scope 1 and 2 emissions. But what caused the most uproar with that announcement was a stipulation that would also require large companies to report their indirect Scope 3 emissions in certain cases. Since then, the SEC has delayed finalizing the rule, which was supposed to happen in October. And SEC chair Gary Gensler has hinted that the final rule might not mandate Scope 3 disclosures after all, alarming some Democratic lawmakers.

Tesla's a great example of what a difference those rules could make. The company has lagged behind other automakers in sharing details about its greenhouse gas emissions. Ford, for example, has garnered "A" grades for its climate change disclosures since 2019, while Tesla earned "F" grades from the CDP, a nonprofit that evaluates companies' environmental reporting.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only. Log in and try again!
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Saturday April 29, @06:51PM (2 children)

    by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Saturday April 29, @06:51PM (#1303937) Homepage Journal

    Bicycles may be fine in a nice warm climate, but it gets damned cold where I live. In 2004 it took ten bucks worth of gas to get to St Louis, I paid $30 for a one way ticket there. [mcgrewbooks.com]

    --
    Carbon, The only element in the known universe to ever gain sentience
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by gawdonblue on Saturday April 29, @10:44PM

    by gawdonblue (412) on Saturday April 29, @10:44PM (#1303967)
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 30, @02:19AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 30, @02:19AM (#1303982)
    Bicycles are terrible in many hot or warm climates though - too often it's too hot or it's too wet. Either way you end up wet from perspiration or from the rain. It's often not so bad to cycle at night or early mornings when it's cooler but then it's more for recreation/exercise than for transportation/commute.

    They're wonderful in those goldilocks climate places. Where it's not cold (no icy roads) but cool enough to enjoy cycling in.