Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday May 10, @03:07PM   Printer-friendly

As the country looks to decarbonize, nuclear’s popularity climbs to the highest level in a decade:

A Gallup survey released in late April found that 55 percent of U.S. adults support the use of nuclear power. That's up four percentage points from last year and reflects the highest level of public support for nuclear energy use in electricity since 2012.

[...] Nuclear energy has historically been a source of immense controversy. A series of high-profile nuclear accidents and disasters, from Three Mile Island in 1979 to Chernobyl in 1986 to Fukushima in 2011, have raised safety concerns — even though the death toll from fossil fuel power generation far outstrips that of nuclear power generation. Several government nuclear programs have also left behind toxic waste that place disproportionate burdens on Indigenous communities.

But nuclear power doesn't produce carbon emissions, and it's more consistent and reliable than wind and solar energy, which vary depending on the weather. For these reasons, the Biden administration has identified nuclear energy as a key climate solution to achieve grid stability in a net-zero future. The administration is pushing for the deployment of a new generation of reactors called "advanced nuclear": a catch-all term for new nuclear reactor models that improve on the safety and efficiency of traditional reactor designs.

In a recent report, the Department of Energy found that regardless of how many renewables are deployed, the U.S. will need an additional 200 gigawatts of advanced nuclear power — enough to power about 160 million homes — to reach President Joe Biden's goal of hitting net-zero emissions by 2050.

Gallup has tracked several swings in public opinion since first asking about nuclear in 1994. From 2004 to 2015, a majority of Americans favored nuclear power use, with a high of 62 percent in support in 2010. But in 2016, the survey found a majority opposition to nuclear power for the first time. Gallup speculated that lower gasoline prices that year may have "lessened Americans' perceptions that energy sources such as nuclear power are needed." In recent years, views on nuclear power had been evenly divided until the latest poll, conducted between March 1 and 23.

The new poll found that 62 percent of Republicans support the use of nuclear power, compared to 46 percent of Democrats. The support from Republicans is likely driven by "a focus on energy independence, supporting innovation, supporting American leadership globally, and supporting American competition with folks like China and Russia specifically in terms of the nuclear space," said Ryan Norman, senior policy advisor at the center-left think tank Third Way.

[...] In addition to the Department of Energy's modeling, the International Energy Agency's Net Zero by 2050 scenario found that in order to fully decarbonize the global economy, worldwide nuclear power capacity would need to double between 2022 and 2050.

In Congress, nuclear power has enjoyed some rare moments of bipartisan support. Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have joined forces to pass a few successful pro-nuclear laws. The 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law injected $6 billion toward maintaining existing nuclear power plants. And while the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act was an entirely Democratic effort, it included a technology-neutral tax credit for low-carbon energy that can be used for nuclear power plants. The climate spending law also allocates millions in investments for advanced nuclear research and demonstration.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only. Log in and try again!
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Wednesday May 10, @07:18PM (1 child)

    by Gaaark (41) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday May 10, @07:18PM (#1305770) Journal

    The 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law injected $6 billion toward maintaining existing nuclear power plants.

    --Top article

    The original cost estimate of $14 billion has risen to $23 billion

    --https://thebulletin.org/2019/06/why-nuclear-power-plants-cost-so-much-and-what-can-be-done-about-it/

    Would not this money be spent better on green tech?
    Make all new housing/buildings be built with solar/wind, and with green space/gardens built on top: but i guess that would cut into profits too much.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by RS3 on Wednesday May 10, @08:58PM

    by RS3 (6367) on Wednesday May 10, @08:58PM (#1305788)

    Would not this money be spent better on green tech?

    Generally I agree, understand, and empathize with the sentiment, but back to the time thing: we need something to carry us over until we have (much) more "green" energy in place. It's like so many things in life: people need to look at trends, progress, movements, economics, supply-chain, transportation / logistics, on and on.

    For example, the more rules, laws, mandates, etc., the govt. puts in place, the more the price skyrockets- for anything and everything. It's all about supply and demand.

    But to make it personal- 10 or so years ago I had a gig job installing PV systems. I didn't make a lot of money doing it, but I felt like I was helping a little. Just showing I agree, not just in words, but actions.

    Make all new housing/buildings be built with solar/wind, and with green space/gardens built on top: but i guess that would cut into profits too much.

    Again, I absolutely agree qualitatively, but again, that mandate will drive PV prices way up. IMHO, we have more of a manufacturing problem. I've railed against "offshoring" when it closes down North American factories and boosts China. Now they own the production. We may do some partial PV assembly here, but I'm not aware of large scale polysilicon manufacturing in the US or Canada (or Europe?) If we could scale up production, then by all means, please please put them everywhere, especially large buildings like shopping and office buildings.

    I don't have numbers, but the guy I was working for doing PV installs (he's also a BSEE + MBA) said that solar hot water heating saves much more dollars than PV, but PV was getting all the press and govt. grants at the time.