SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Journal by DeathMonkey
A Manhattan federal jury found that Donald Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll in a luxury department store dressing room in the spring of 1996 and awarded her $5 million for battery and defamation.
Carroll alleged Trump raped her in the Bergdorf Goodman department store and then defamed her when he denied her claim, said she wasn’t his type and suggested she made up the story to boost sales of her book. Trump denied all wrongdoing. He does not face any jail time as a result of the civil verdict.
Jury finds Donald Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll in civil case, awards her $5 million
Donald Trump Sexually Abused E. Jean Carrol
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 88 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
(1)
I think that I shall never see
A billboard lovely as a tree.
Indeed, unless the billboards fall
I'll never see a tree at all.
-- Ogden Nash
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11, @04:27PM (78 children)
Allegedly sexually abused in 1996, with no evidence. At least the jury rejected the rape claim.
(Score: 2) by Tork on Thursday May 11, @05:40PM (21 children)
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11, @05:58PM (20 children)
I know that if you are trying to be a gold digger after a few decades, your claim should be considered spurious. Maybe he grabbed her by the pussy, maybe she liked it at the time. She doesn't need 5mil for her supposed trauma.
(Score: -1, Troll) by Runaway1956 on Thursday May 11, @06:24PM (19 children)
Yeah, if you managed to live your life for decades, with no mention of being raped, but you suddenly can't live with it anymore, people really need to look at the financial angle. Or the political angle. There needs to be some kind of evidence to convict a man of rape.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by pTamok on Thursday May 11, @06:37PM
Given that you disagree with both the judge and the jury in this civil case, you'll need to provide some kind of evidence that you have actually reviewed the facts and history of the case and can come up with a plausible argument why you might be correct. Were you in the courtroom? It's relevant, because simply using the media reports as your sources is completely inadequate.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Freeman on Thursday May 11, @06:48PM
I find that I could see him doing it, but who knows, considering the incident was from 1996. Public opinion was more likely to swing against the woman at that time, compared to nowadays. Better? Worse? Still broken, yes.
Joshua 1:9 "Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be thou dismayed: for the Lord thy God is with thee"
(Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11, @07:20PM (3 children)
Why do you care about a puece of trash like Trump that you pinkieswearsy you never voted for? Why do you always defend him? Are you afraid that some victim from your past will do the same?
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 14, @04:48AM (2 children)
Runsaway is confused. He never voted for Trump, but he did vote for Hilary Rodham Clinton to be his "First Lady". The first in a long line of PILFs, including Stefanik and Gabbard. Sick, really.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 15, @04:05AM (1 child)
Spam? Seemed like God's honest truth, to me. But that is just my opinion, and I am not up against twelve good and true.
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 17, @04:43AM
I think the "spam all suspected aristarchoi" program is at an end, having proved to be futile, and stupid, and vindictive. Janrinok's bile and ocher rises, to no good end.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by DannyB on Thursday May 11, @07:41PM
E. Jean Carroll said it was not about the money but about getting her name back. Trump ruined her name.
Trump said in deposition that she's not his type, yet he then went on talking about how hot she was when seeing a photo of her that dates from about the time of the alleged incident.
E. Jean Carroll produced an actual court case.
Trump didn't even bother to show up. He couldn't look her in the eye. He couldn't look the jury in the eye. Then in TYPICAL Trump fashion, he LIES that he didn't have a chance to defend himself. But of course, Trump lying is not a surprise. Seeing you unconditionally defend him is not a surprise.
Other things Trump said that have been public for years are (1) the access hollywood tapes [and I won't repeat that here], and (2) that the AIDS epidemic was his own personal Vietnam.
Trump is a fine Christian man who has three wives, the second two of which he was having an affair with while still married to the prior wife.
I could go on about Trump, but the man and his own public words and public behavior make E. Jean Carroll's account highly believable. Do you actually believe that E. Jean Carroll was NOT sexually assaulted by Trump?
How many others like E. Jean Carroll did not want to put their entire life into the public spotlight and kept quiet?
How often should I have my memory checked? I used to know but...
(Score: 3, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Thursday May 11, @08:20PM
If by "no" you mean dozens, and "never" you mean for decades, sure!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11, @09:14PM (6 children)
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11, @11:42PM (5 children)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11, @11:49PM (4 children)
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 12, @12:02AM (3 children)
Context: Somebody said rape. It was E. Jean Carroll. The magically competent jury didn't believe her, or did a compromise verdict so they could go home.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 12, @12:36AM
(Score: 1, Flamebait) by DannyB on Friday May 12, @02:31PM
People should not make fun of Trump for having to use both hands to hold a glass in order to drink.
Back during his presidency, he once touched a bible and the burns still have not yet healed.
How often should I have my memory checked? I used to know but...
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 12, @05:43PM
Normal people don't need to simp this hard for such a worthless person. The man has no redeeming qualities, and that is a strange thing to say about any human. Usually there is some small redeeming factor, usually family oriented, but even there the guy is a huge creep and abusive father.
Conservatives have settled on hatred after being manipulated by rightwing rhetoric engineered to keep them angry. That is why Trump appealed to them. Will they be able to set aside their hatred for libs in favor of anger at the wealthy manipulators? Or will the US tear itself apart for the 2nd time but for even less reason?
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 13, @06:18AM (3 children)
I am truly sorry I raped you, Runaway! It was so many years ago, and you were so drunk, but all you crew on the boat said you had it coming, and you wanted it. Were they wrong? Nice to see you have gotten beyond all the "raping" and have come to lead a quiet Fox News life out there in loverly Arkansas! Go, Duggers!
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 14, @04:53AM (2 children)
Why is this comment spam moderated? Seems to be a perfectly cromulent wild speculation.
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 15, @04:07AM (1 child)
Rape apologies are always spam modded on SoylentNews, because SoylentNews is a kind of Donald Trump sort of thing.
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16, @05:19AM
Or, we have to suppress the evidence of the violation of the Runsaway, because it would undermine conservative mores, more than Trump already has. Curious, in a pathetic kind of way.
(Score: 4, Funny) by DeathMonkey on Thursday May 11, @08:26PM (49 children)
Boy, if only we had some kind of audio tape where he admits to grabbing women by the pussy to provide as evidence that he grabbed a woman by the pussy!
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11, @08:34PM (47 children)
You should listen to the tape. He admits no such thing. But you hear what you wanna hear, but I'll leave it to you to provide an exact transcript, since you're making the accusation
(Score: 5, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Thursday May 11, @08:36PM (46 children)
Trump: "Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything."
Full Transcript [bbc.com]
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11, @10:33PM (44 children)
Like always, you leave out the important part. He did not say that he grabbed them by the pussy. Try posting the complete sentence instead of just the part you want to hear
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Tork on Thursday May 11, @11:30PM (43 children)
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 12, @04:57AM (38 children)
You have to ask the people that put him on the front page every day, and the people who write journals about him. Why is it worth their time? Well, for mass media, that's easy to figure out, money talks, but DM and his democrat friends do it for free. That's really weird.
Whatever.. Nobody addresses the basics.. his numbers are going up. Look at DNC, and it's easy to see why
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Tork on Friday May 12, @07:14AM (37 children)
Of course he gets talked about a lot, you guys wanted a reality show star and you got it. Why defend him when he repeatedly betrays your trust? He still hasn’t shown you one lick of proof the election was rigged, but you’re still defending a bunch of folks who tried to force him to be president! That ain’t the pro-constitution philosophy Republicans claim they’d die for. Heh he hasn’t even fulfilled his promise to pay their legal bills. What is wrong with you?
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 13, @01:10AM (36 children)
I didn't want him. He was always slime, but he wins because there is no opposition. I don't want your damn democrats either, Nixon won because the dems nominated Humphrey, this is how they play it to keep everything neatly divided down the middle, they don't really oppose the republicans, they're not meant to, it's pure blame shifting theater, they eat from the same trough and serve the same people that fill that trough. Nobody is going to finance real opposition to 95% reelection rates. The problem is the whiny democrats here that take all criticism as defense of Trump (like you are doing right here), it's a bullshit red herring distraction from their own party corruption that let Trump win in the first place, in fact you can probably even blame them for Trump's nomination, believing he was such a soft target
https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/3735333-democrats-weigh-possibilities-pitfalls-of-meddling-in-gop-primaries-after-midterm-wins/ [thehill.com]
Sometimes the magic works, even better when meddling in their own primaries *cough* Sanders
(Score: 2) by Tork on Saturday May 13, @01:39AM (35 children)
Oh PUH...leeeease, enough with the projection. The dude is STILL lying about the election being stolen from him yet the GOP is thinking of going ahead with him anyway. Trump's style of corruption is in plain view right in front of you. And when you finally do get something on the dems, like Biden improperly handling classified docs, Trump is not only doing that... he's doing it WORSE! But does he get a fingerwag from you lot over it? Nope! Biden did, even from CNN!
Can you blame the democrats, their voting base, or the media for Trump's corrupt actions? Nope! You know exactly who to blame for that and you won't. Gonna say it again: What is wrong with you?
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 13, @02:35AM (34 children)
Yes it is! And he can still win.. And the dems just yell, "Sttoooppppp!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4UFQWKjy_I [youtube.com]
Instead they (you) all harp on Trump instead of putting up opposition candidates that will reverse republican policy, you just give us recycled Clinton/Obama with more lip service that can easily toss the elections over to the republicans, with Trump
See? There you go again, accusing me of blaming other people for what Trump does. But you know what? I do blame democrats, their voting base, or the media for rewarding Trump's corrupt actions with all the attention given. It's the epitome of "There's no such thing as bad press".
And you tell me, why wasn't Trump arrested to taking the documents? There would be no objection from me.. That's definitely on the democrats, must be because 'they all do it', don't want to get caught in their own net
You all are way off base about what I think of Trump, and you won't acknowledge the symbiosis between the two factions that has him on the pedestal.
(Score: 2) by Tork on Saturday May 13, @03:04AM (33 children)
🙄 Your dialogue-tree is in bad need of a competent editor.
The dems were not complicit in Trump's attempt to circumvent an election, you're right I won't acknowledge that. As for my assessment of your feelings for Trump: When one person misstates your views, that's their problem. When everyone misstates your views, that's YOUR problem.
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 13, @06:12AM (32 children)
It's just the tribal democrats that misstate my views, as a means of distraction. This place is full of them. Nonpartisan people understand perfectly. They see the symbiosis, the singular objective also. If you refuse to see the fundamentals, there's nothing I can do. It's not my problem because I don't care.
(Score: 2) by Tork on Saturday May 13, @06:20AM (31 children)
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 14, @01:40AM (30 children)
His basic point is correct. It is currently impossible to criticize a Democrat, or a Democrat's actions, or Democrat party policies without a being screamed down as a Trump supporter.
Democrats WERE complicit in Trumps' win in 2016, and will be again if he wins in 2024. They refuse to put up decent politicians to oppose him, and to deflect from this they spend their entire time and money budgets attacking. They don't articulate any decent policies and their entire election strategy is "at least we're not Trump".
I don't like Trump, but if the Democrats run senile 84 year old candidate against Trump in 2024 then they are just giving the election to him.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Tork on Sunday May 14, @02:48AM (29 children)
That's what happens when you claim something the dems do is bad but ignore it when "your side" is doing it. Sometimes you land there when you rush to his defense without thinking it through, other times it happens when your news sources just plain don't cover it. You don't lose the debates you have a solid foundation on.
This is all immaterial because you can make an argument that the dems got trump elected, but that's where the blame ends. Can't blame them for J6, ya'all tried and it failed. That wasn't because the phrase "orange fan mad" was a lethal blow. 🙄
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 14, @04:04AM (28 children)
See?? There you go again! You say that Trump is "my side". You just don't stop with the BS. We don't rag on Trump because we don't vote for him, this is what we expect from him, there is no need to talk about him. People who claim to be better actually have to do better to be taken seriously and win my vote. They are the ones I will criticize. They don't really oppose him, if they did, they would run better people instead of just repeating "We're not Trump! 2024", the other AC is right. The rules are simple and finite.
(Score: 2) by Tork on Sunday May 14, @04:39AM (12 children)
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 14, @05:05AM (11 children)
This is the "other AC" above.
I don't say anything negative about Trump because if everyone ignored him he'd go away. I try not to say anything about him at all.
Ok, he's scum. He's slime. He should be run out of town on a rail. You happy now?
It doesn't change the fact that the Democrats are crappy too, and they won't get any better unless you can accept there are problems to address.
But no, you'd rather hate on one corrupt perverted old fart than accept that you are supporting a senile corrupt old fart.
(Score: 2) by Tork on Sunday May 14, @05:26AM (10 children)
Hilariously untrue and you know it. We haven't forgotten the NFT baseball cards. ;) Oh and the topic our little conversation is happening under... the dems didn't cause that nor did you cause it by forgetting to worship him. Your posts aren't internally consistent, just like the "other AC".
Oof, you got me there! I surrender!! ... is what I might have said if you had been serious. You had a number of examples you could have drawn from, but I'm guessing 'slime' is one of the few things you didn't defend him on.
Just a reminder you were just pushing for the dems to use 'better candidates' but did not have a similar suggestion for the gop. "You should put up a guy that hasn't beaten Trump in an election!" -- funny! Do you really think your preaching is going anywhere while supporting a dude with his track record?
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 14, @12:45PM (9 children)
Wow. Blinders on much?
I want the democrats to do better because I want them to beat Trump. Biden is obviously senile now. Two more years and he's going to be worse.
Running him again is handing the election to the republicans. Whether it's Trump or DeSantis they will wipe the floor with him.
(Score: 2) by Tork on Sunday May 14, @02:34PM (8 children)
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 14, @02:55PM (1 child)
Pretty sure we've got a few bits running around these discussions. If not then. . . .
(Score: 1, Flamebait) by Tork on Sunday May 14, @02:57PM
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 14, @09:30PM (5 children)
I want the democrats to do better. Trump is irrelevant to that. I want them to stop picking senile corporate lapdogs as candidates.
(Score: 1, Flamebait) by Tork on Sunday May 14, @09:44PM (4 children)
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 3, Funny) by Tork on Sunday May 14, @10:18PM (3 children)
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 15, @09:17PM (2 children)
Maybe he's not irrelevant. Trump picking who is going to be the Democrats' candidates would explain their shit choices.
(Score: 2) by Tork on Monday May 15, @11:26PM (1 child)
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16, @01:33AM
Omarosa is a model of success for women everywhere because she broke the ceiling. I mean it fell on her, but those are totally the same thing, right? /s
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Monday May 15, @04:37PM (14 children)
If you don't want to talk about Trump have you considered NOT posting 50 comments in a Trump discussion?
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 15, @07:57PM (13 children)
It's not about me, it's about you people obsessing over him instead of seeking out opposition to increase your chances of winning a clear majority. It is your weak candidates that discourages voting, handing elections over to republicans and Trump on a silver platter, something which you need apparently to continue with your blame passing theater. Forget about Trump and find someone better, or carry on with your dramatics, whatever... If he wins it will definitely be your fault for letting him run unopposed again, just like 2016. You're doing his campaigning for him, all for free
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 15, @11:14PM (3 children)
DNC: boring centrist Biden
GOP: fascist or fascist clown?
Yeah ok bub, conservatives never need to take responsibility especially for their own actions. Of course the DNC is going to run centrust candidates to keep the US from going Full Nazi, totally not the fault of GOP white supremacists. You are a nitwit gotta earn the inevitable downmod ;^)
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 15, @11:42PM (2 children)
Can't wait for Trump's "surprise win" in 2024. "How could this have happened!?" they exclaimed.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 15, @11:54PM
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16, @03:50PM
With how badly the GOP has gerrymandered and passed anti voting legislation, no I would not be surprised. Can't forget Republucans voting AGAINST voting machines that provide a paper audit of their results. All the election fraud we find out about is from Republicans, so yeah would not be surprised if cheaters win again like in 2000.
(Score: 3, Funny) by Tork on Monday May 15, @11:33PM (6 children)
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16, @09:46PM (5 children)
It is blatantly obvious to anyone who watches him that Biden is not fit to be President now. Given two more years of age-related decline and you might as well run a wooden dummy. The DNC should be looking for their new leaders not running around with a hate boner for the MAGA crowd.
He is 81 years old. He'll be 83 before he begins a second term. People that old drop dead. Who do the DNC have to replace him?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16, @10:40PM
They can give him a drug cocktail to keep him lucid during the debates, and use an electrical brain stimulator during the debate prep. Then keep him off the campaign trail as much as possible. He only has to last until Election Day. Kamala Harris is backup President.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 18, @07:43AM (3 children)
While you're not entirely wrong, the choice you are gladly gargling is so much worse!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 19, @09:33AM (2 children)
You are wrong on at least three counts.
1/ I don't like Trump. He is a loudmouth buffoon.
2/ However, Trump is objectively NOT worse than someone with advanced senile dementia.
3/ On an objective evaluation, what was so bad about the Trump presidency?
Regarding 3/ I don't like Trump, but given four years of being President, why is it so hard for the Senile Dementia Defenders to point at something Trump did wrong on a national policy level, rather than the personal attacks? Much as we might dislike him, he didn't actually start gassing the people he didn't like in concentration camps, or start any wars for profit.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 19, @05:49PM
Gargle gargle gargle!!!
(Score: 2) by Tork on Saturday May 20, @06:45PM
1. Bull. That's why you claim you hate Trump, to avoid having those discussions. Your news sources only give you superficial debate points that, more often than not, crumble under scrutiny.
2. False. But now I see why you've spent so much time playing down the insurrectionists. Wobbly, substance-free claim.
3. He was impeached over attempting to profit via war.
Funny how you didn't want to mention his name earlier but now all the sudden you're perfectly fine with having another go at defending him. 🙄 He's never going to reward your crush on him.
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16, @06:40PM (1 child)
runaway is gonna run himself out of mod points.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 20, @06:49PM
(Score: 2) by DannyB on Friday May 12, @01:40PM (3 children)
It has ceased to be about policy or governing or adult things like that. It is about owning the libs. Like a football game. Go MY TEAM! It doesn't matter whether something is true or false, what matters is whether MY TEAM supports it or the other evil rival inhuman satanic baby eating team supports it.
As unbelievable as it sounds for anyone more than several decades old, we now actually in real life have congress critters that spout the most outlandish crazy nonsense while their base cheers them on.
I hope that helps shed some light.
I don't hate them. I simply wish they would grow up and act like adults.
How often should I have my memory checked? I used to know but...
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 15, @09:25PM (1 child)
Yes. But what you are apparently blind to is that it is the same on both sides. Instead of being a decent party and putting forward reasonable candidates and good policies, everything the democrats do and say is "ANTI-Trump". They are obsessed with him.
There is no vision, no goals, no building-up, it is all "tear down the fascists".
"Tear down the fascists" is fine, but the most effective way to do that would be to be a better party, not get down in the mud and wrestle with a pig.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 17, @08:55PM
Haha, you rwnjs are sad.
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16, @10:04AM
Wow I haven't seen such a projection since cinemax.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 12, @03:32AM
Trump even grabs elephants by their nether parts.
https://phantom-elmundo.unidadeditorial.es/42123bb8d44093fa504ac4e9145d2436/resize/473/f/jpg/assets/multimedia/imagenes/2023/05/10/16837259936564.jpg [unidadeditorial.es]
from https://www.elmundo.es/opinion/2023/05/11/645b9eb9e4d4d8572e8b4575.html [elmundo.es]
Translation: I love Republicans, you grab them by their parts and they still support you.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 15, @10:48PM
Seems fair to me. He grabbed her by the pussy, now she has him by the balls.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11, @10:23PM (2 children)
They didn't convict him of assault with a dead weapon?
(Score: 2) by Tork on Thursday May 11, @11:39PM (1 child)
You mean like a baseball bat? Or are you thinking more like he used a Mummy's curse?
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 12, @12:03AM
Ask Stormy.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 12, @05:44AM
I'm not sure that the jury deciding Trump's dick was too small to penetrate her isn't the win y'all seem to think it is.
(Score: 3, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Friday May 12, @05:00PM (1 child)
According to a jury of his peers the preponderance of evidence was provided.
And the sexual battery and defamation is no longer alleged.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 13, @08:43AM
The worst (best?) part is that he can't stand being wrong or losing. So, he is out there still claiming she is wrong. Too bad that he is just racking up the legal bills for the next suit after the appeals for this one are up.
(Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11, @07:22PM (8 children)
As we can see the regressives like runaway are out defending the rapist conman traitor. Doing crimes right in the open, Trump's only skill. What a slime ball.
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16, @10:00AM (7 children)
The tribalism of the Demophiles continues, as they blindly consume whatever the media feeds them, disregarding the truth and the actual state of the nation. They believe their ideology will protect them from the consequences of their actions, but history has shown that this is not the case. The Kronstadt uprising was crushed by the Soviets, and the Brownshirts were defeated by the Nazis. You'll be done, even before the rest of us.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 16, @03:54PM (2 children)
So you are a fascist predicting that domestic terrorists and nazi republicans will just murder all people left of DeSatanist? At least you are finally embracing your degenerate nature.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 19, @09:38AM (1 child)
Um, no. He's saying that the left-wing nutjobs like antifa will be the first ones the Left will put up against the wall. The biggest threat to the party are those close to it.
Why do you think Big Brother never caught Emmanuel Goldstein?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 23, @06:48PM
- checks notes
Nope, Republicans are the ones ramping up to put people against walls and murder them, in fact they are actively promoting such on social media. Even here on SN with deer runaway! Always projection with you fascists, and a heaping dose of martyr complex too. Yer poor white privilege trollolol
(Score: 2) by Tork on Tuesday May 16, @05:28PM (3 children)
Projection. You actually bought into 'blindly consuming' book bans and couldn't even maintain your defense of them after a basic challenge. You also just plain didn't know the republicans were sabotaging the US Postal Service (during a pandemic...) all because they knew they'd lose to Biden. Also you've maintained a pathetic defense of the attackers at the January 6th insu^h^h^hbake sale, which was about trying to bypass democracy to install an unelected leader . Tribalism, blind consumption of media feeds, disregarding truth and the actual state of the nation... you are describing you.
Gee, which uprisings have you defended recently? Heh. Oh, and we've seen which political party is attracting Nazi flags at its rallies. You lot didn't boot them out, either.
Correct, for example: Trump hasn't paid any of the legal fees to his 'legitimate political discourse' crowd. He didn't pardon them, either. Whenever your BDS rage subsides you should take a good hard look around the room, hypocrite.
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 19, @09:42AM (2 children)
You know, when I went to school porn was banned in both the classroom and the library. Have you actually looked at those bans? Porn is still banned. They are just refusing to make an exception to allow gay and trans porn.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 19, @03:34PM
Not consistent with the way the law actually works. You'd know that if you weren't trying to justify it after-the-fact.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 22, @02:09AM
I'm not sure. I can still finds books that have heterosexual relationships and cis-gendered people wearing clothes...............