Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Journal by hubie

Posted over on Knuth's webpage is an email he recently wrote to Stephen Wolfram in which he describes some prodding of ChatGPT. He posed 20 questions and gives the verbatim answers as well as commentary on the answers.

Preface: Since one of today's popular recreations is to play with
chatGPT, I decided on 07 April 2023 to try my own little experiment,
as part of a correspondence with Stephen Wolfram.

The results were sufficiently interesting that I passed them on
to a few friends the next day, and I've also been mentioning them in
conversation when the topic comes up.

So I was asked to post the story online, and here it is (lightly edited)!
  -- Don Knuth
PS: I did not edit my questions or the computer's answers, only my
own commentary at the end.

It is an interesting read that I highly recommend. And he ends his letter:

Well this has been interesting indeed. Studying the task of
how to fake it certainly leads to insightful subproblems galore.
As well as fun conversations during meals.

On the other hand, Gary Marcus's column in the April CACM
brilliantly describes the terrifying consequences of these
developments.

I find it fascinating that novelists galore have written for decades
about scenarios that might occur after a "singularity" in which
superintelligent machines exist. But as far as I know, not a single
novelist has realized that such a singularity would almost surely
be preceded by a world in which machines are 0.01% intelligent
(say), and in which millions of real people would be able to interact
with them freely at essentially no cost.

The Gary Marcus CACM piece he refers to is Hoping for the Best as AI Evolves.

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by janrinok on Monday May 22, @08:38AM

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Monday May 22, @08:38AM (#1307296) Journal

    Spam moderation has certainly killed your participation in SoylentNews and it was the very reason for that clause in the ban, along with the measures employed to control your sock puppets. Thank you for confirming another success. If you hate it so much here, why haven't you left? It is simple, you have nowhere else to go. You are resigned to posting in other peoples' journals and crying like a little child about how the world is so unfair to you. You created this situation, and now you do not like what you have created.

    How many threats and promises have you made over the last 18 months or so? All have come to nothing. Oh, I forgot, you are Anonymous and I should expect you.

    There are no spam moderations on the front page, and very few Troll or Off-Topic comments either.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2