Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday January 26 2015, @03:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the too-hard-to-swallow? dept.

With the advent of the internet came a superabundance of available information regarding personal health. However, with this deluge of available information also came a hefty downfall - a massive amount of misguided and unreliable information.

Out of all fields of discussion, it's safe to say that no other topics are more dangerous to have misinformation spread about than diet and nutrition. If a nutrition myth is continually repeated, it can soon become a culturally accepted truth, something that is dangerous to the general public. So for that matter, this article will address some of the most common and misguided nutrition 'facts' out there today.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by ThG on Monday January 26 2015, @05:24PM

    by ThG (4568) on Monday January 26 2015, @05:24PM (#138234)

    IQ tests are rather meaningless, as they only show how good one is at taking IQ tests.

  • (Score: 1) by Arik on Monday January 26 2015, @05:55PM

    by Arik (4543) on Monday January 26 2015, @05:55PM (#138251) Journal
    Well I would have suggested a basic literacy test but I know that the 93% failure rate would be too high. What would you suggest?
    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
    • (Score: 2) by M. Baranczak on Monday January 26 2015, @06:32PM

      by M. Baranczak (1673) on Monday January 26 2015, @06:32PM (#138265)

      Requiring a literacy test before posting would be a swell idea. It might catch the smart-asses who don't realize (or pretend they don't realize) that a word (like "organic") can have more than one accepted meaning.

      • (Score: 2) by pnkwarhall on Monday January 26 2015, @09:59PM

        by pnkwarhall (4558) on Monday January 26 2015, @09:59PM (#138334)

        Require the test before **every** post or before one can create an account? Or maybe give the test on a regular basis, like you have to be literate-certified annually, like a driver's license. Also, you need to read one fiction and one non-fiction book every month

        These standards will keep Soylent News a head-and-shoulders above every other tech news'n'discussion site out there!

        --
        Lift Yr Skinny Fists Like Antennas to Heaven
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Monday January 26 2015, @08:18PM

    by frojack (1554) Subscriber Badge on Monday January 26 2015, @08:18PM (#138300) Journal

    IQ tests are rather meaningless, as they only show how good one is at taking IQ tests.

    That's good enough, if you ask me.

    Knowledge AND reasoning sufficient to score well on an IQ test will server you well in life, even if it is (in your opinion) meaningless.

    That there are corner cases, savants and test-chokers that don't do well is meaningless. There are people who genuinely don't like Bacon too.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 28 2015, @03:05PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 28 2015, @03:05PM (#138896)

      Knowledge AND reasoning sufficient to score well on an IQ test will server you well in life, even if it is (in your opinion) meaningless.

      IQ is mere pseudoscience, so no one should be taking it seriously.

      • (Score: 2) by frojack on Wednesday January 28 2015, @08:08PM

        by frojack (1554) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday January 28 2015, @08:08PM (#138995) Journal

        IQ is mere pseudoscience, so no one should be taking it seriously.

        It may be an imprecise measure, but that does not make it pseudoscience.
        Its a reasonable predictor of success in society and in life in general.

        --
        No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.