Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Tuesday January 27 2015, @01:10PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-goes-around-comes-around dept.

Hasn't this idea been re-cycled before ? What was old is now new again dept:

Private information would be much more secure if individuals moved away from cloud-based storage towards peer-to-peer systems, where data is stored in a variety of ways and across a variety of sites, argues a University of Cambridge researcher.

In an article published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society A, Professor Jon Crowcroft argues that by parcelling and spreading data across multiple sites, and weaving it together like a tapestry, not only would our information be safer, it would be quicker to access, and could potentially be stored at lower overall cost.

The internet is a vast, decentralised communications system, with minimal administrative or governmental oversight. However, we increasingly access our information through cloud-based services, such as Google Drive, iCloud and Dropbox, which are very large centralised storage and processing systems. Cloud-based services offer convenience to the user, as their data can be accessed from anywhere with an internet connection, but their centralised nature can make them vulnerable to attack, such as when personal photos of mostly young and female celebrities were leaked last summer after their iCloud accounts were hacked.

Storing information on the cloud makes it easily accessible to users, while removing the burden of managing it; and the cloud's highly centralised nature keeps costs low for the companies providing the storage. However, centralised systems can lack resilience, meaning that service can be lost when any one part of the network access path fails.

http://phys.org/news/2015-01-era-cloud.html

[Paper]: http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/471/2175/20140862

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Shijiyaku on Tuesday January 27 2015, @02:51PM

    by Shijiyaku (1553) on Tuesday January 27 2015, @02:51PM (#138553)

    What i do is make a lot of email accounts for trivial things like fb, forums, games, et al. It also cuts down on spam!
    But the best is - dont be stupid and use different login+passwords.

    --
    Born too late for sail;too early for space
  • (Score: 2) by Magic Oddball on Wednesday January 28 2015, @01:26PM

    by Magic Oddball (3847) on Wednesday January 28 2015, @01:26PM (#138847) Journal

    If you haven't given SpamGourmet [spamgourmet.com] a try, I highly recommend it — it lets us functionally have an endless number of semi-custom (pattern "customword.username@spamgourmet") email addresses created on the fly, so we can set a unique one for each account and limit the number of messages passed through to us from each.