Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 12 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Saturday June 20 2015, @11:30PM   Printer-friendly

"At some point as a country, we have to reckon with what happens. It's not enough to express sympathy. You don't see this kind of murder, on this scale, with this kind of frequency in other advanced countries on earth." - President Obama.

Discuss.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday June 21 2015, @04:50AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday June 21 2015, @04:50AM (#198945) Journal

    Not without unlimited government.

    [...]

    Unlimited government can be local.

    No it can't. For "local" is a constraint. And by definition, unlimited government doesn't have any constraints.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @01:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 21 2015, @01:05PM (#199059)

    No it can't. For "local" is a constraint.

    Why not just say that no government is technically unlimited, then? Big, unlimited... whatever you want to call it.

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday June 21 2015, @08:25PM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday June 21 2015, @08:25PM (#199189) Journal

      Why not just say that no government is technically unlimited, then?

      Because it's not true? Just because a government can kill people under certain legal situations doesn't mean that it can arbitrarily kill people. For example, is a government "technically unlimited" because its law enforcement can kill in self-defense?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 22 2015, @01:34AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 22 2015, @01:34AM (#199246)

        Because it's not true? Just because a government can kill people under certain legal situations doesn't mean that it can arbitrarily kill people.

        Defending yourself or others from imminent (not hypothetical) physical harm is the only situation I can see where killing is acceptable. Deciding that someone should die after they've already been captured is an example of big government, if you prefer that term.

        • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday June 22 2015, @02:09AM

          by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday June 22 2015, @02:09AM (#199253) Journal

          Deciding that someone should die after they've already been captured is an example of big government, if you prefer that term.

          That term is inappropriate too, because small governments can exercise that sort of power too. And it still depends on what sort of constraints legal and otherwise exist on the government officials.